Out of the conjunction of activities and men around the law-jobs there arise the crafts of law and so the craftsmen. Advocacy, counseling, judging, lawmaking, administering – these are major groupings of the law-crafts. … At the present juncture, the fresh study of these crafts and of the manner of their best doing is one of the major needs of jurisprudence. (Llewellyn 1941: 188) A principal task of a philosophy of law at this time is to provide a constructive account of legal practices that reveals how and when they achieve valid results. An adequate philosophy of law will thus understand the law as much more than legal doctrine, the law of rules. Such a philosophy will bring a radical empiricism to bear on the actual practices in which lawyers engage while interviewing, counseling, engaging in pretrial practices, mediating, trying cases, writing briefs, and arguing appeals, and in which judges engage in deciding their cases and justifying their decisions. It will rely on thick description and linguistic phenomenology. It will seek to identify how the best of those practices persuades their audiences of what true law in particular cases really is. Thus the line between philosophy and legal anthropology will blur. This is something that Clifford Geertz (2000) has already seen occurring in the various forms of phenomenology and pragmatism that have characterized twentieth-century philosophy.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||On Philosophy in American Law|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Number of pages||7|
|State||Published - Jan 1 2009|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)