The Theory of Legal Cynicism and Sunni Insurgent Violence in Post-Invasion Iraq

John Hagan*, Joshua Kaiser, Anna Hanson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

We elaborate a cultural framing theory of legal cynicism—previously used to account for neighborhood variation in Chicago homicides—to explain Arab Sunni victimization and insurgent attacks during the U.S. post-invasion occupation of Iraq. Legal cynicism theory has an unrecognized power to explain collective and interpersonal violence in international as well as U.S. settings. We expand on how “double and linked” roles of state and non-state actors can be used to analyze violence against Arab Sunni civilians. Arab Sunnis responded to reports of unnecessary violent attacks by U.S./Coalition soldiers with a legally cynical framing of the U.S./Coalition-led invasion and occupation, the new Shia-dominated Iraqi state, and its military and police. A post-invasion frame amplification of beliefs about state-based illegitimacy, unresponsiveness, and insecurity made it not only possible but predictable that Arab Sunni insurgent attacks would continue against U.S./Coalition forces and transfer to Shia-dominated Iraqi government forces. Violence in Iraq persisted despite U.S. surge efforts to end the Arab Sunni insurgency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-346
Number of pages31
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2016

Keywords

  • crime
  • law
  • violence
  • war

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Theory of Legal Cynicism and Sunni Insurgent Violence in Post-Invasion Iraq'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this