TY - JOUR
T1 - The timing of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery
T2 - A single-center experience with 6869 consecutive patients
AU - Cloney, Michael B.
AU - Hopkins, Benjamin
AU - Dhillon, Ekamjeet S.
AU - Dahdaleh, Nader S.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Prophylactic anticoagulation, or chemoprophylaxis, can prevent VTE. However, the timing of VTEs after spine surgery and the effect of chemoprophylaxis on VTE timing remain underinvestigated. METHODS The records of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries were retrospectively examined. Data on patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital course, and timing of VTEs were collected. Patients who received chemoprophylaxis were compared with those who did not. Appropriate regression models were used to examine selection for chemoprophylaxis and the timing of VTEs. RESULTS Age (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.023-1.aaaaaaaa051p <0.001), longer surgery (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004p <0.001), history of DVT (OR 1.697, 95% CI 1.038-2.776,p = 0.035), and fusion surgery (OR 1.917, 95% CI 1.356-2.709p <0.001) predicted selection for chemoprophylaxis. Chemoprophylaxis patients experienced more VTEs (3.62% vs 2.03% of patients, respectivelyp <0.001), and also required longer hospital stays (5.0 days vs 1.0 days HR 0.5107p <0.0001) and had a greater time to the occurrence of VTE (median 6.8 days vs 3.6 days HR 0.6847 p = 0.0003). The cumulative incidence of VTEs correlated with the postoperative day in both groups (Spearman r = 0.9746, 95% CI 0.9457-0.9883, and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group Spearman r = 0.9061, 95% CI 0.8065-0.9557, and p <0.0001 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), and the cumulative incidence of VTEs was higher in the nonchemoprophylaxis group throughout the 30-day postoperative period. Cumulative VTE incidence and postoperative day were linearly correlated in the frst 2 postoperative weeks (R = 0.9396 and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group R = 0.8190 and p = 0.0003 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group) and the remainder of the 30-day postoperative period (R = 0.9535 and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group R = 0.6562 and p = 0.0058 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), but the linear relationships differ between these 2 postoperative periods (p <0.0001 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation reduces the cumulative incidence of VTE after spine surgery. The cumulative incidence of VTEs rises linearly in the frst 2 postoperative weeks and then plateaus. Surgeons should consider early initiation of chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing spine surgery.
AB - OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Prophylactic anticoagulation, or chemoprophylaxis, can prevent VTE. However, the timing of VTEs after spine surgery and the effect of chemoprophylaxis on VTE timing remain underinvestigated. METHODS The records of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries were retrospectively examined. Data on patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital course, and timing of VTEs were collected. Patients who received chemoprophylaxis were compared with those who did not. Appropriate regression models were used to examine selection for chemoprophylaxis and the timing of VTEs. RESULTS Age (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.023-1.aaaaaaaa051p <0.001), longer surgery (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004p <0.001), history of DVT (OR 1.697, 95% CI 1.038-2.776,p = 0.035), and fusion surgery (OR 1.917, 95% CI 1.356-2.709p <0.001) predicted selection for chemoprophylaxis. Chemoprophylaxis patients experienced more VTEs (3.62% vs 2.03% of patients, respectivelyp <0.001), and also required longer hospital stays (5.0 days vs 1.0 days HR 0.5107p <0.0001) and had a greater time to the occurrence of VTE (median 6.8 days vs 3.6 days HR 0.6847 p = 0.0003). The cumulative incidence of VTEs correlated with the postoperative day in both groups (Spearman r = 0.9746, 95% CI 0.9457-0.9883, and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group Spearman r = 0.9061, 95% CI 0.8065-0.9557, and p <0.0001 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), and the cumulative incidence of VTEs was higher in the nonchemoprophylaxis group throughout the 30-day postoperative period. Cumulative VTE incidence and postoperative day were linearly correlated in the frst 2 postoperative weeks (R = 0.9396 and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group R = 0.8190 and p = 0.0003 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group) and the remainder of the 30-day postoperative period (R = 0.9535 and p <0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group R = 0.6562 and p = 0.0058 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), but the linear relationships differ between these 2 postoperative periods (p <0.0001 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation reduces the cumulative incidence of VTE after spine surgery. The cumulative incidence of VTEs rises linearly in the frst 2 postoperative weeks and then plateaus. Surgeons should consider early initiation of chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing spine surgery.
KW - Anticoagulation
KW - Chemoprophylaxis
KW - DVT
KW - Deep vein thrombosis
KW - Pulmonary embolism
KW - Spine surgery
KW - Vascular disorders
KW - Venous thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040059268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040059268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161399
DO - 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161399
M3 - Article
C2 - 29125431
AN - SCOPUS:85040059268
VL - 28
SP - 88
EP - 95
JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
SN - 1547-5654
IS - 1
ER -