Abstract
This chapter investigates the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs in sentences: specifically, the phenomenon of meaning adjustment under semantic strain. The first issue in semantic adjustment is the locus of change. It presents the verb mutability hypothesis-the semantic structures conveyed by verbs and other predicate terms are more likely to be altered to fit the context than the semantic structures conveyed by object-reference terms. The meaning adjustment initiated in response to a mismatch with context is nevertheless characterized by orderly semantic processes. This chapter concerns with the combination of meaning-specifically, how the meanings of nouns and verbs combine to make new sentence meanings. It focuses on cases where the noun and verb are semantically ill-matched. Understanding such cases is not only useful in explaining metaphorical extension but also in constraining the set of explanations that can apply in normal sentence processing.The pattern of verb adjustment suggests a middle course between an extreme contextual negotiation position, in which words have no inherent meaning, meaning is entirely contextually bound, and a fixed-meaning approach, in which rigid word meanings are simply concatenated. The change of meaning occurs to accommodate contextual constraints, but this change involves computations over the internal structure of the word meanings, particularly that of the verb.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Lexical Ambiguity Resolution |
Subtitle of host publication | Perspective from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence |
Publisher | Elsevier Science |
Pages | 343-382 |
Number of pages | 40 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780080510132 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780934613507 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2013 |
Funding
This research was conducted at the University of California at San Diego, at the University of Washington, Seattle, at Bolt Beranek and Newman in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and was sponsored in part by the Center for the Study of Reading, under National Institute of Education Contract No. 400–81–0030. Albert Stevens collaborated in the original development of these ideas and has greatly influenced this research. We thank Melissa Bowerman, Doug Medin, Ed Smith and Len Talmy for many insightful discussions of these issues and Gary Cottrell and Michael Jeziorski for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. We also thank Monica Olmstead for her help in the research.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences