Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders: Findings from a randomized clinical trial

Hilde De Saeger, Jan H. Kamphuis*, Stephen E. Finn, Justin D. Smith, Roel Verheul, Jan J. van Busschbach, Dine J. Feenstra, Eva K. Horn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The field of clinical personality assessment is lacking in published empirical evidence regarding its treatment and clinical utility. This article reports on a randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 74) allocating patients awaiting treatment in a specialized clinic for personality disorders to either 4 sessions of (a) therapeutic assessment (TA) or (b) a structured goal-focused pretreatment intervention (GFPTI). In terms of short-term outcome, TA demonstrated superior ability to raise outcome expectancies and patient perceptions of progress toward treatment (Cohen's d = 0.65 and 0.56, respectively) and yielded higher satisfaction (d = 0.68). Moreover, patients reported marginally stronger alliance to the TA clinicians than to GFPT clinicians (d = 0.46), even though therapists perceived the alliance as equally positive in both groups. No differences in symptomatic ratings were observed. Results are discussed with reference to treatment utility in this particular patient group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)474-483
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological assessment
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Personality Disorders
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics
Personality Assessment
Aptitude
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Clinical utility
  • Personality disorders
  • Pretreatment intervention
  • Psychological assessment
  • Symptom change
  • Therapeutic assessment
  • Treatment efficacy
  • Treatment readiness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

De Saeger, Hilde ; Kamphuis, Jan H. ; Finn, Stephen E. ; Smith, Justin D. ; Verheul, Roel ; van Busschbach, Jan J. ; Feenstra, Dine J. ; Horn, Eva K. / Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders : Findings from a randomized clinical trial. In: Psychological assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 474-483.
@article{994a7eff228049afb9b2bc8d5ff414e2,
title = "Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders: Findings from a randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "The field of clinical personality assessment is lacking in published empirical evidence regarding its treatment and clinical utility. This article reports on a randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 74) allocating patients awaiting treatment in a specialized clinic for personality disorders to either 4 sessions of (a) therapeutic assessment (TA) or (b) a structured goal-focused pretreatment intervention (GFPTI). In terms of short-term outcome, TA demonstrated superior ability to raise outcome expectancies and patient perceptions of progress toward treatment (Cohen's d = 0.65 and 0.56, respectively) and yielded higher satisfaction (d = 0.68). Moreover, patients reported marginally stronger alliance to the TA clinicians than to GFPT clinicians (d = 0.46), even though therapists perceived the alliance as equally positive in both groups. No differences in symptomatic ratings were observed. Results are discussed with reference to treatment utility in this particular patient group.",
keywords = "Clinical utility, Personality disorders, Pretreatment intervention, Psychological assessment, Symptom change, Therapeutic assessment, Treatment efficacy, Treatment readiness",
author = "{De Saeger}, Hilde and Kamphuis, {Jan H.} and Finn, {Stephen E.} and Smith, {Justin D.} and Roel Verheul and {van Busschbach}, {Jan J.} and Feenstra, {Dine J.} and Horn, {Eva K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/a0035667",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "474--483",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders : Findings from a randomized clinical trial. / De Saeger, Hilde; Kamphuis, Jan H.; Finn, Stephen E.; Smith, Justin D.; Verheul, Roel; van Busschbach, Jan J.; Feenstra, Dine J.; Horn, Eva K.

In: Psychological assessment, Vol. 26, No. 2, 06.2014, p. 474-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders

T2 - Findings from a randomized clinical trial

AU - De Saeger, Hilde

AU - Kamphuis, Jan H.

AU - Finn, Stephen E.

AU - Smith, Justin D.

AU - Verheul, Roel

AU - van Busschbach, Jan J.

AU - Feenstra, Dine J.

AU - Horn, Eva K.

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - The field of clinical personality assessment is lacking in published empirical evidence regarding its treatment and clinical utility. This article reports on a randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 74) allocating patients awaiting treatment in a specialized clinic for personality disorders to either 4 sessions of (a) therapeutic assessment (TA) or (b) a structured goal-focused pretreatment intervention (GFPTI). In terms of short-term outcome, TA demonstrated superior ability to raise outcome expectancies and patient perceptions of progress toward treatment (Cohen's d = 0.65 and 0.56, respectively) and yielded higher satisfaction (d = 0.68). Moreover, patients reported marginally stronger alliance to the TA clinicians than to GFPT clinicians (d = 0.46), even though therapists perceived the alliance as equally positive in both groups. No differences in symptomatic ratings were observed. Results are discussed with reference to treatment utility in this particular patient group.

AB - The field of clinical personality assessment is lacking in published empirical evidence regarding its treatment and clinical utility. This article reports on a randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 74) allocating patients awaiting treatment in a specialized clinic for personality disorders to either 4 sessions of (a) therapeutic assessment (TA) or (b) a structured goal-focused pretreatment intervention (GFPTI). In terms of short-term outcome, TA demonstrated superior ability to raise outcome expectancies and patient perceptions of progress toward treatment (Cohen's d = 0.65 and 0.56, respectively) and yielded higher satisfaction (d = 0.68). Moreover, patients reported marginally stronger alliance to the TA clinicians than to GFPT clinicians (d = 0.46), even though therapists perceived the alliance as equally positive in both groups. No differences in symptomatic ratings were observed. Results are discussed with reference to treatment utility in this particular patient group.

KW - Clinical utility

KW - Personality disorders

KW - Pretreatment intervention

KW - Psychological assessment

KW - Symptom change

KW - Therapeutic assessment

KW - Treatment efficacy

KW - Treatment readiness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901821953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901821953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0035667

DO - 10.1037/a0035667

M3 - Article

C2 - 24467336

AN - SCOPUS:84901821953

VL - 26

SP - 474

EP - 483

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 2

ER -