Thought Calibration: How Thinking Just the Right Amount Increases One's Influence and Appeal

Daniella M. Kupor; Zakary L. Tormala; Michael I. Norton; Derek D. Rucker

doi:10.1177/1948550613499940

Thought Calibration: How Thinking Just the Right Amount Increases One's Influence and Appeal

Daniella M. Kupor, Zakary L. Tormala, Michael I. Norton, Derek D. Rucker

Marketing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous research suggests that people draw inferences about their attitudes and preferences based on their own thoughtfulness. The current research explores how observing other individuals make decisions more or less thoughtfully can shape perceptions of those individuals and their decisions and ultimately impact observers' willingness to be influenced by them. Three studies suggest that observing others make more (vs. less) thoughtful decisions generates more positive reactions when a choice is difficult but more negative reactions when a choice is easy. In essence, people perceive the quality of others' decisions to be greater when other individuals engage in the right amount of thinking for the situation. These assessments then affect observers' own decisions and openness to influence.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	263-270
Number of pages	8
Journal	Social Psychological and Personality Science
Volume	5
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613499940
State	Published - Apr 2014

Keywords

attitudes
decision difficulty
liking
social influence
thoughtfulness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Clinical Psychology

Access to Document

10.1177/1948550613499940

Cite this

@article{8bb27af9c7fc4d6fa8399e6d8e261ae5,

title = "Thought Calibration: How Thinking Just the Right Amount Increases One's Influence and Appeal",

abstract = "Previous research suggests that people draw inferences about their attitudes and preferences based on their own thoughtfulness. The current research explores how observing other individuals make decisions more or less thoughtfully can shape perceptions of those individuals and their decisions and ultimately impact observers' willingness to be influenced by them. Three studies suggest that observing others make more (vs. less) thoughtful decisions generates more positive reactions when a choice is difficult but more negative reactions when a choice is easy. In essence, people perceive the quality of others' decisions to be greater when other individuals engage in the right amount of thinking for the situation. These assessments then affect observers' own decisions and openness to influence.",

keywords = "attitudes, decision difficulty, liking, social influence, thoughtfulness",

author = "Kupor, {Daniella M.} and Tormala, {Zakary L.} and Norton, {Michael I.} and Rucker, {Derek D.}",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1177/1948550613499940",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "5",

pages = "263--270",

journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",

issn = "1948-5506",

publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thought Calibration

T2 - How Thinking Just the Right Amount Increases One's Influence and Appeal

AU - Kupor, Daniella M.

AU - Tormala, Zakary L.

AU - Norton, Michael I.

AU - Rucker, Derek D.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Previous research suggests that people draw inferences about their attitudes and preferences based on their own thoughtfulness. The current research explores how observing other individuals make decisions more or less thoughtfully can shape perceptions of those individuals and their decisions and ultimately impact observers' willingness to be influenced by them. Three studies suggest that observing others make more (vs. less) thoughtful decisions generates more positive reactions when a choice is difficult but more negative reactions when a choice is easy. In essence, people perceive the quality of others' decisions to be greater when other individuals engage in the right amount of thinking for the situation. These assessments then affect observers' own decisions and openness to influence.

AB - Previous research suggests that people draw inferences about their attitudes and preferences based on their own thoughtfulness. The current research explores how observing other individuals make decisions more or less thoughtfully can shape perceptions of those individuals and their decisions and ultimately impact observers' willingness to be influenced by them. Three studies suggest that observing others make more (vs. less) thoughtful decisions generates more positive reactions when a choice is difficult but more negative reactions when a choice is easy. In essence, people perceive the quality of others' decisions to be greater when other individuals engage in the right amount of thinking for the situation. These assessments then affect observers' own decisions and openness to influence.

KW - attitudes

KW - decision difficulty

KW - liking

KW - social influence

KW - thoughtfulness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897782717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897782717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550613499940

DO - 10.1177/1948550613499940

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897782717

SN - 1948-5506

VL - 5

SP - 263

EP - 270

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

IS - 3

ER -

Thought Calibration: How Thinking Just the Right Amount Increases One's Influence and Appeal

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this