TY - JOUR
T1 - Three principles of serendip
T2 - Insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research
AU - Fine, Gary Alan
AU - Deegan, James G.
N1 - Funding Information:
A version of this article was presented to the Qualitative Research Conference, Waterloo, Ontario, May, 1994and, to a colloquium at the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the University ofCalifornia, San Francisco. Theauthors wish to thank Sharon Connolly for her assistance in the preparation of this article, and Martha Allexsaht-Snider, Adele Clarke, Penny Oldfather, Virginia Olesen, and Leonard Schatzman for comments on a previous draft. This paper was partially prepared while the first author was a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. He is grateful for financial support provided by National Science Foundation No. SBR-9022192. The authors shared equal time and effort in the planning, preparation, and writing of this article.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - This article discusses the role of serendipity in qualitative research. Drawing on ideas and methodological suggestions from a set of classic and recent fieldwork accounts, the authors examine conceptions of serendipity and the ways that these conceptions become embedded in the processes by which we incorporate and embrace the temporal, relational, and analytical aspects of serendipity. The authors reject the perspective that it is the divine roll of the dice that determines serendipity and argue that serendipity is the interactive outcome of unique and contingent “mixes” of insight coupled with chance. A wide range of attempts to make sense of serendipity in sociology and anthropology are provided as exemplars of how planned insights coupled with unplanned events can potentially yield meaningful and interesting discovery in qualitative research.
AB - This article discusses the role of serendipity in qualitative research. Drawing on ideas and methodological suggestions from a set of classic and recent fieldwork accounts, the authors examine conceptions of serendipity and the ways that these conceptions become embedded in the processes by which we incorporate and embrace the temporal, relational, and analytical aspects of serendipity. The authors reject the perspective that it is the divine roll of the dice that determines serendipity and argue that serendipity is the interactive outcome of unique and contingent “mixes” of insight coupled with chance. A wide range of attempts to make sense of serendipity in sociology and anthropology are provided as exemplars of how planned insights coupled with unplanned events can potentially yield meaningful and interesting discovery in qualitative research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008848431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008848431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0951839960090405
DO - 10.1080/0951839960090405
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008848431
SN - 0951-8398
VL - 9
SP - 434
EP - 447
JO - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
JF - International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
IS - 4
ER -