TY - JOUR
T1 - Time is domain
T2 - factors affecting primary fascial closure after trauma and non-trauma damage control laparotomy (data from the EAST SLEEP-TIME multicenter registry)
AU - Kwon, Eugenia
AU - Krause, Cassandra
AU - Luo-Owen, Xian
AU - McArthur, Kaitlin
AU - Cochran-Yu, Meghan
AU - Swentek, Lourdes
AU - Burruss, Sigrid
AU - Turay, David
AU - Krasnoff, Chloe
AU - Grigorian, Areg
AU - Nahmias, Jeffrey
AU - Butt, Ahsan
AU - Gutierrez, Adam
AU - LaRiccia, Aimee
AU - Kincaid, Michelle
AU - Fiorentino, Michele
AU - Glass, Nina
AU - Toscano, Samantha
AU - Ley, Eric Jude
AU - Lombardo, Sarah
AU - Guillamondegui, Oscar
AU - Bardes, James Migliaccio
AU - DeLa’O, Connie
AU - Wydo, Salina
AU - Leneweaver, Kyle
AU - Duletzke, Nicholas
AU - Nunez, Jade
AU - Moradian, Simon
AU - Posluszny, Joseph
AU - Naar, Leon
AU - Kaafarani, Haytham
AU - Kemmer, Heidi
AU - Lieser, Mark
AU - Hanson, Isaac
AU - Chang, Grace
AU - Bilaniuk, Jaroslaw W.
AU - Nemeth, Zoltan
AU - Mukherjee, Kaushik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Purpose: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is used for both traumatic and non-traumatic indications. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure (PFC) in a timely fashion has been associated with complications including sepsis, fistula, and mortality. We sought to identify factors associated with time to PFC in a multicenter retrospective cohort. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data from 15 centers in the EAST SLEEP-TIME registry, including age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), small and large bowel resection, bowel discontinuity, vascular procedures, retained packs, number of re-laparotomies, net fluid balance after 24 h, trauma, and time to first takeback in 12-h increments to identify key factors associated with time to PFC. Results: In total, 368 patients (71.2% trauma, of which 50.6% were penetrating, median ISS 25 [16, 34], with median Apache II score 15 [11, 22] in non-trauma) were in the cohort. Of these, 92.9% of patients achieved PFC at 60.8 ± 72.0 h after 1.6 ± 1.2 re-laparotomies. Each additional re-laparotomy reduced the odds of PFC by 91.5% (95%CI 88.2–93.9%, p < 0.001). Time to first re-laparotomy was highly significant (p < 0.001) in terms of odds of achieving PFC, with no difference between 12 and 24 h to first re-laparotomy (ref), and decreases in odds of PFC of 78.4% (65.8–86.4%, p < 0.001) for first re-laparotomy after 24.1–36 h, 90.8% (84.7–94.4%, p < 0.001) for 36.1–48 h, and 98.1% (96.4–99.0%, p < 0.001) for > 48 h. Trauma patients had increased likelihood of PFC in two separate analyses (p = 0.022 and 0.002). Conclusion: Time to re-laparotomy ≤ 24 h and minimizing number of re-laparotomies are highly predictive of rapid achievement of PFC in patients after trauma- and non-trauma DCL. Level of evidence: 2B.
AB - Purpose: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is used for both traumatic and non-traumatic indications. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure (PFC) in a timely fashion has been associated with complications including sepsis, fistula, and mortality. We sought to identify factors associated with time to PFC in a multicenter retrospective cohort. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data from 15 centers in the EAST SLEEP-TIME registry, including age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), small and large bowel resection, bowel discontinuity, vascular procedures, retained packs, number of re-laparotomies, net fluid balance after 24 h, trauma, and time to first takeback in 12-h increments to identify key factors associated with time to PFC. Results: In total, 368 patients (71.2% trauma, of which 50.6% were penetrating, median ISS 25 [16, 34], with median Apache II score 15 [11, 22] in non-trauma) were in the cohort. Of these, 92.9% of patients achieved PFC at 60.8 ± 72.0 h after 1.6 ± 1.2 re-laparotomies. Each additional re-laparotomy reduced the odds of PFC by 91.5% (95%CI 88.2–93.9%, p < 0.001). Time to first re-laparotomy was highly significant (p < 0.001) in terms of odds of achieving PFC, with no difference between 12 and 24 h to first re-laparotomy (ref), and decreases in odds of PFC of 78.4% (65.8–86.4%, p < 0.001) for first re-laparotomy after 24.1–36 h, 90.8% (84.7–94.4%, p < 0.001) for 36.1–48 h, and 98.1% (96.4–99.0%, p < 0.001) for > 48 h. Trauma patients had increased likelihood of PFC in two separate analyses (p = 0.022 and 0.002). Conclusion: Time to re-laparotomy ≤ 24 h and minimizing number of re-laparotomies are highly predictive of rapid achievement of PFC in patients after trauma- and non-trauma DCL. Level of evidence: 2B.
KW - Damage control laparotomy
KW - Non-trauma
KW - Primary fascial closure
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120061816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120061816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-021-01814-w
DO - 10.1007/s00068-021-01814-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 34845499
AN - SCOPUS:85120061816
SN - 1863-9933
VL - 48
SP - 2107
EP - 2116
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
IS - 3
ER -