TY - JOUR
T1 - Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium
T2 - Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002-2006
AU - Druckman, James N.
AU - Kifer, Martin J.
AU - Michael, Parkin
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Gary Jacobson for providing candidate background data, and the dozens of individuals who assisted in data collection. Support for this research was provided by the University of Minnesota McKnight Land-Grant Professorship, Northwestern University’s AT&T Research Scholar Fund, and, for the survey of Web site designers, the National Science Foundation (SES-0822819 and SES-0822782). Authors’ names are listed in alphabetical order.
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - In a few short years, the World Wide Web has become a standard part of candidates' campaign tool kits. Virtually all candidates have their own sites, and voters, journalists, and activists visit the sites with increasing frequency. In this article, we study what candidates do on these sites-in terms of the information they present-by exploring one of the most enduring and widely debated campaign strategies: "going negative." Comparing data from over 700 congressional candidate Web sites, over three election cycles (2002, 2004, and 2006), with television advertising data, we show that candi-dates go negative with similar likelihoods across these media. We also find that while similar dynamics drive negativity on the Web and in television advertising, there are some notable differences. These differences likely stem, in part, from the truncated sample available with television data (i.e., many candidates do not produce ads). Our results have implications for understanding negative campaigning and for the ways in which scholars can study campaign dynamics
AB - In a few short years, the World Wide Web has become a standard part of candidates' campaign tool kits. Virtually all candidates have their own sites, and voters, journalists, and activists visit the sites with increasing frequency. In this article, we study what candidates do on these sites-in terms of the information they present-by exploring one of the most enduring and widely debated campaign strategies: "going negative." Comparing data from over 700 congressional candidate Web sites, over three election cycles (2002, 2004, and 2006), with television advertising data, we show that candi-dates go negative with similar likelihoods across these media. We also find that while similar dynamics drive negativity on the Web and in television advertising, there are some notable differences. These differences likely stem, in part, from the truncated sample available with television data (i.e., many candidates do not produce ads). Our results have implications for understanding negative campaigning and for the ways in which scholars can study campaign dynamics
KW - Campaigns
KW - Candidate Web sites
KW - Internet
KW - Negative campaigning
KW - New media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75949120248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75949120248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10584600903502607
DO - 10.1080/10584600903502607
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:75949120248
SN - 1058-4609
VL - 27
SP - 88
EP - 103
JO - Political Communication
JF - Political Communication
IS - 1
ER -