To the best of our knowledge

Social expectations and epistemic normativity

Sanford C Goldberg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book/ReportBook

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We expect certain things of each other as epistemic subjects, and it is the normativity of these expectations that underwrites the normativity of epistemic assessment itself. In developing this claim Sanford C. Goldberg aims to honor the insights of both internalist and externalist approaches to epistemic justification. With the internalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and maintained in an epistemically responsible fashion; with the externalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and sustained through a reliable process. In this book Goldberg proposes to marry these two dimensions into a single account of the standards of epistemic assessment. This marriage reflects our profound and ineliminable dependence on one another for what we know of the world-a dependence which is rationalized by the expectations we are entitled to have of one another as epistemic subjects. The expectations in question are those through which we hold each other accountable to standards of both (epistemic) reliability and (epistemic) responsibility. The resulting theory has far-reaching implications not only for the theory of epistemic normativity, but also for our understanding of epistemic defeat, the theory of epistemic responsibility, and for a full appreciation of the various social dimensions of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages277
ISBN (Print)9780198793670
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2018

Fingerprint

Epistemic Normativity
Social Knowledge
Normativity
Internalist
Epistemic Responsibility
Externalist
Marriage
Defeat
Epistemic Justification

Keywords

  • Defeaters
  • Epistemic normativity
  • Knowledge
  • Reliability
  • Responsibility
  • Social epistemology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

@book{922b0c50c20f4a46b61f12792a4832a0,
title = "To the best of our knowledge: Social expectations and epistemic normativity",
abstract = "We expect certain things of each other as epistemic subjects, and it is the normativity of these expectations that underwrites the normativity of epistemic assessment itself. In developing this claim Sanford C. Goldberg aims to honor the insights of both internalist and externalist approaches to epistemic justification. With the internalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and maintained in an epistemically responsible fashion; with the externalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and sustained through a reliable process. In this book Goldberg proposes to marry these two dimensions into a single account of the standards of epistemic assessment. This marriage reflects our profound and ineliminable dependence on one another for what we know of the world-a dependence which is rationalized by the expectations we are entitled to have of one another as epistemic subjects. The expectations in question are those through which we hold each other accountable to standards of both (epistemic) reliability and (epistemic) responsibility. The resulting theory has far-reaching implications not only for the theory of epistemic normativity, but also for our understanding of epistemic defeat, the theory of epistemic responsibility, and for a full appreciation of the various social dimensions of knowledge.",
keywords = "Defeaters, Epistemic normativity, Knowledge, Reliability, Responsibility, Social epistemology",
author = "Goldberg, {Sanford C}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198793670.001.0001",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780198793670",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

To the best of our knowledge : Social expectations and epistemic normativity. / Goldberg, Sanford C.

Oxford University Press, 2018. 277 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

TY - BOOK

T1 - To the best of our knowledge

T2 - Social expectations and epistemic normativity

AU - Goldberg, Sanford C

PY - 2018/4/19

Y1 - 2018/4/19

N2 - We expect certain things of each other as epistemic subjects, and it is the normativity of these expectations that underwrites the normativity of epistemic assessment itself. In developing this claim Sanford C. Goldberg aims to honor the insights of both internalist and externalist approaches to epistemic justification. With the internalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and maintained in an epistemically responsible fashion; with the externalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and sustained through a reliable process. In this book Goldberg proposes to marry these two dimensions into a single account of the standards of epistemic assessment. This marriage reflects our profound and ineliminable dependence on one another for what we know of the world-a dependence which is rationalized by the expectations we are entitled to have of one another as epistemic subjects. The expectations in question are those through which we hold each other accountable to standards of both (epistemic) reliability and (epistemic) responsibility. The resulting theory has far-reaching implications not only for the theory of epistemic normativity, but also for our understanding of epistemic defeat, the theory of epistemic responsibility, and for a full appreciation of the various social dimensions of knowledge.

AB - We expect certain things of each other as epistemic subjects, and it is the normativity of these expectations that underwrites the normativity of epistemic assessment itself. In developing this claim Sanford C. Goldberg aims to honor the insights of both internalist and externalist approaches to epistemic justification. With the internalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and maintained in an epistemically responsible fashion; with the externalist he embraces the idea that knowledgeable belief requires belief that is formed and sustained through a reliable process. In this book Goldberg proposes to marry these two dimensions into a single account of the standards of epistemic assessment. This marriage reflects our profound and ineliminable dependence on one another for what we know of the world-a dependence which is rationalized by the expectations we are entitled to have of one another as epistemic subjects. The expectations in question are those through which we hold each other accountable to standards of both (epistemic) reliability and (epistemic) responsibility. The resulting theory has far-reaching implications not only for the theory of epistemic normativity, but also for our understanding of epistemic defeat, the theory of epistemic responsibility, and for a full appreciation of the various social dimensions of knowledge.

KW - Defeaters

KW - Epistemic normativity

KW - Knowledge

KW - Reliability

KW - Responsibility

KW - Social epistemology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047064877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047064877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780198793670.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780198793670.001.0001

M3 - Book

SN - 9780198793670

BT - To the best of our knowledge

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -