TY - JOUR
T1 - Topological Relations Between Objects Are Categorically Coded
AU - Lovett, Andrew
AU - Franconeri, Steven L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a National Institutes of Health training grant in human cognition at Northwestern University (T32 NS047987), as well as by National Science Foundation Grants BCS-1056730 CAREER and IIS-1162067.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - How do individuals compare images—for example, two graphs or diagrams—to identify differences between them? We argue that categorical relations between objects play a critical role. These relations divide continuous space into discrete categories, such as “above” and “below,” or “containing” and “overlapping,” which are remembered and compared more easily than precise metric values. These relations should lead to categorical perception, such that viewers find it easier to notice a change that crosses a category boundary (one object is now above, rather than below, another, or now contains, rather than overlaps with, another) than a change of equal magnitude that does not cross a boundary. We tested the influence of a set of topological categorical relations from the cognitive-modeling literature. In a visual same/different comparison task, viewers more accurately noticed changes that crossed relational category boundaries, compared with changes that did not cross these boundaries. The results highlight the potential of systematic exploration of the boundaries of between-object relational categories.
AB - How do individuals compare images—for example, two graphs or diagrams—to identify differences between them? We argue that categorical relations between objects play a critical role. These relations divide continuous space into discrete categories, such as “above” and “below,” or “containing” and “overlapping,” which are remembered and compared more easily than precise metric values. These relations should lead to categorical perception, such that viewers find it easier to notice a change that crosses a category boundary (one object is now above, rather than below, another, or now contains, rather than overlaps with, another) than a change of equal magnitude that does not cross a boundary. We tested the influence of a set of topological categorical relations from the cognitive-modeling literature. In a visual same/different comparison task, viewers more accurately noticed changes that crossed relational category boundaries, compared with changes that did not cross these boundaries. The results highlight the potential of systematic exploration of the boundaries of between-object relational categories.
KW - categorical perception
KW - open data
KW - sequential same/different task
KW - spatial relations
KW - topological relations
KW - visual comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031109339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031109339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0956797617709814
DO - 10.1177/0956797617709814
M3 - Article
C2 - 28783447
AN - SCOPUS:85031109339
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 28
SP - 1408
EP - 1418
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 10
ER -