TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a field of intersectionality studies
T2 - Theory, applications, and praxis
AU - Cho, Sumi
AU - Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams
AU - McCall, Leslie
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Intersectional insights and frameworks are put into practice in a multitude of highly contested, complex, and unpredictable ways. We group such engagements with intersectionality into three loosely defined sets of practices: applications of an intersectional framework or investigations of intersectional dynamics; debates about the scope and content of intersectionality as a theoretical and methodological paradigm; and political interventions employing an intersectional lens. We propose a template for fusing these three levels of engagement with intersectionality into a field of intersectional studies that emphasizes collaboration and literacy rather than unity. Our objective here is not to offer pat resolutions to all questions about intersectional approaches but to spark further inquiry into the dynamics of intersectionality both as an academic frame and as a practical intervention in a world characterized by extreme inequalities. At the same time, we wish to zero in on some issues that we believe have occupied a privileged place in the field from the very start, as well as on key questions that will define the field in the future. To that end, we foreground the social dynamics and relations that constitute subjects, displacing what often seems like an undue emphasis on the subjects (and categories) themselves as the starting point of inquiry. We also situate the development and contestation of these focal points of intersectional studies within the politics of academic and social movements-which, we argue, are themselves deeply intersectional in nature and therefore must continually be interrogated as part of the intersectional project.
AB - Intersectional insights and frameworks are put into practice in a multitude of highly contested, complex, and unpredictable ways. We group such engagements with intersectionality into three loosely defined sets of practices: applications of an intersectional framework or investigations of intersectional dynamics; debates about the scope and content of intersectionality as a theoretical and methodological paradigm; and political interventions employing an intersectional lens. We propose a template for fusing these three levels of engagement with intersectionality into a field of intersectional studies that emphasizes collaboration and literacy rather than unity. Our objective here is not to offer pat resolutions to all questions about intersectional approaches but to spark further inquiry into the dynamics of intersectionality both as an academic frame and as a practical intervention in a world characterized by extreme inequalities. At the same time, we wish to zero in on some issues that we believe have occupied a privileged place in the field from the very start, as well as on key questions that will define the field in the future. To that end, we foreground the social dynamics and relations that constitute subjects, displacing what often seems like an undue emphasis on the subjects (and categories) themselves as the starting point of inquiry. We also situate the development and contestation of these focal points of intersectional studies within the politics of academic and social movements-which, we argue, are themselves deeply intersectional in nature and therefore must continually be interrogated as part of the intersectional project.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880342314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880342314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/669608
DO - 10.1086/669608
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880342314
SN - 0097-9740
VL - 38
SP - 785
EP - 810
JO - Signs
JF - Signs
IS - 4
ER -