Towards a bioecological model of bilingual development

Adriana Weisleder*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At its best, the field of bilingualism is a dynamic discipline informed by diverse perspectives. Carroll's critical review - situated within a linguistics framework - contends that current research on bilingual exposure and language development suffers from a lack of theoretical clarity, and makes little contribution to our understanding of bilingual acquisition. Carroll's push (Carroll) towards greater precision in our thinking about the relation between input and outcomes is an important and welcome challenge. However, it is also critical to keep in mind the social context that motivates much of the current research on bilingual development, and to leave room for studies whose main goal is to provide answers to societally important questions about bilingual children's health and development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-36
Number of pages2
JournalBilingualism
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

multilingualism
linguistics
lack
language
health
Language Development
Critical Review
Bilingual Development
Bilingualism
Children's Health
Bilingual children
Child Development
Bilingual Acquisition
Social Context
Clarity

Keywords

  • childhood bilingualism
  • input
  • language exposure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{e8d94e774ae140c5b0f692f6a2429520,
title = "Towards a bioecological model of bilingual development",
abstract = "At its best, the field of bilingualism is a dynamic discipline informed by diverse perspectives. Carroll's critical review - situated within a linguistics framework - contends that current research on bilingual exposure and language development suffers from a lack of theoretical clarity, and makes little contribution to our understanding of bilingual acquisition. Carroll's push (Carroll) towards greater precision in our thinking about the relation between input and outcomes is an important and welcome challenge. However, it is also critical to keep in mind the social context that motivates much of the current research on bilingual development, and to leave room for studies whose main goal is to provide answers to societally important questions about bilingual children's health and development.",
keywords = "childhood bilingualism, input, language exposure",
author = "Adriana Weisleder",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1366728916000389",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "35--36",
journal = "Bilingualism: Language and Cognition",
issn = "1366-7289",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Towards a bioecological model of bilingual development. / Weisleder, Adriana.

In: Bilingualism, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 35-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a bioecological model of bilingual development

AU - Weisleder, Adriana

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - At its best, the field of bilingualism is a dynamic discipline informed by diverse perspectives. Carroll's critical review - situated within a linguistics framework - contends that current research on bilingual exposure and language development suffers from a lack of theoretical clarity, and makes little contribution to our understanding of bilingual acquisition. Carroll's push (Carroll) towards greater precision in our thinking about the relation between input and outcomes is an important and welcome challenge. However, it is also critical to keep in mind the social context that motivates much of the current research on bilingual development, and to leave room for studies whose main goal is to provide answers to societally important questions about bilingual children's health and development.

AB - At its best, the field of bilingualism is a dynamic discipline informed by diverse perspectives. Carroll's critical review - situated within a linguistics framework - contends that current research on bilingual exposure and language development suffers from a lack of theoretical clarity, and makes little contribution to our understanding of bilingual acquisition. Carroll's push (Carroll) towards greater precision in our thinking about the relation between input and outcomes is an important and welcome challenge. However, it is also critical to keep in mind the social context that motivates much of the current research on bilingual development, and to leave room for studies whose main goal is to provide answers to societally important questions about bilingual children's health and development.

KW - childhood bilingualism

KW - input

KW - language exposure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961393078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961393078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1366728916000389

DO - 10.1017/S1366728916000389

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84961393078

VL - 20

SP - 35

EP - 36

JO - Bilingualism: Language and Cognition

JF - Bilingualism: Language and Cognition

SN - 1366-7289

IS - 1

ER -