Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia

Aaron M. Meyer, Jennifer E Mack, Cynthia K Thompson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People with agrammatic aphasia often experience greater difficulty comprehending passive compared to active sentences. The Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Grodzinsky, 2000) proposes that aphasic individuals cannot generate accurate syntactic representations of passive sentences and, hence, use an agent-first processing strategy which leads to at-chance performance. We tested this claim using the eye tracking-while-listening paradigm in order to reveal online processing routines. Ten agrammatic aphasic participants and 10 age-matched controls listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture matching task (i.e., selecting between two pictures with reversed thematic roles), while their eye movements were monitored. Control participants' performance was at ceiling, whereas accuracy for the aphasic participants was above chance for active sentences and at chance for passive sentences. Further, for the control participants, the eye movement data showed an initial agent-first processing bias, followed by fixation on the correct picture in the vicinity of the verb in both active and passive sentences. However, the aphasic participants showed no evidence of agent-first processing, counter the predictions of the TDH. In addition, in active sentences, they reliably fixated the correct picture only at sentence offset, reflecting slowed processing. During passive sentence processing, fixations were at chance throughout the sentence, but different patterns were noted for correct and incorrect trials. These results are consistent with the proposal that agrammatic sentence comprehension failure involves lexical processing and/or lexical integration deficits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-43
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neurolinguistics
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
Eye Movements
comprehension
performance
deficit
Sentence Comprehension
Aphasic
Passive Sentences
Agrammatic Aphasia
paradigm
trend
evidence
experience
Fixation

Keywords

  • Agent-first strategy
  • Agrammatic aphasia
  • Eye tracking
  • Online sentence processing
  • Passive sentences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Meyer, Aaron M. ; Mack, Jennifer E ; Thompson, Cynthia K. / Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. In: Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2012 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 31-43.
@article{770066c7d6b54df0bd525dd09d767316,
title = "Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia",
abstract = "People with agrammatic aphasia often experience greater difficulty comprehending passive compared to active sentences. The Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Grodzinsky, 2000) proposes that aphasic individuals cannot generate accurate syntactic representations of passive sentences and, hence, use an agent-first processing strategy which leads to at-chance performance. We tested this claim using the eye tracking-while-listening paradigm in order to reveal online processing routines. Ten agrammatic aphasic participants and 10 age-matched controls listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture matching task (i.e., selecting between two pictures with reversed thematic roles), while their eye movements were monitored. Control participants' performance was at ceiling, whereas accuracy for the aphasic participants was above chance for active sentences and at chance for passive sentences. Further, for the control participants, the eye movement data showed an initial agent-first processing bias, followed by fixation on the correct picture in the vicinity of the verb in both active and passive sentences. However, the aphasic participants showed no evidence of agent-first processing, counter the predictions of the TDH. In addition, in active sentences, they reliably fixated the correct picture only at sentence offset, reflecting slowed processing. During passive sentence processing, fixations were at chance throughout the sentence, but different patterns were noted for correct and incorrect trials. These results are consistent with the proposal that agrammatic sentence comprehension failure involves lexical processing and/or lexical integration deficits.",
keywords = "Agent-first strategy, Agrammatic aphasia, Eye tracking, Online sentence processing, Passive sentences",
author = "Meyer, {Aaron M.} and Mack, {Jennifer E} and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "31--43",
journal = "Journal of Neurolinguistics",
issn = "0911-6044",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. / Meyer, Aaron M.; Mack, Jennifer E; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 31-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia

AU - Meyer, Aaron M.

AU - Mack, Jennifer E

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - People with agrammatic aphasia often experience greater difficulty comprehending passive compared to active sentences. The Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Grodzinsky, 2000) proposes that aphasic individuals cannot generate accurate syntactic representations of passive sentences and, hence, use an agent-first processing strategy which leads to at-chance performance. We tested this claim using the eye tracking-while-listening paradigm in order to reveal online processing routines. Ten agrammatic aphasic participants and 10 age-matched controls listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture matching task (i.e., selecting between two pictures with reversed thematic roles), while their eye movements were monitored. Control participants' performance was at ceiling, whereas accuracy for the aphasic participants was above chance for active sentences and at chance for passive sentences. Further, for the control participants, the eye movement data showed an initial agent-first processing bias, followed by fixation on the correct picture in the vicinity of the verb in both active and passive sentences. However, the aphasic participants showed no evidence of agent-first processing, counter the predictions of the TDH. In addition, in active sentences, they reliably fixated the correct picture only at sentence offset, reflecting slowed processing. During passive sentence processing, fixations were at chance throughout the sentence, but different patterns were noted for correct and incorrect trials. These results are consistent with the proposal that agrammatic sentence comprehension failure involves lexical processing and/or lexical integration deficits.

AB - People with agrammatic aphasia often experience greater difficulty comprehending passive compared to active sentences. The Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Grodzinsky, 2000) proposes that aphasic individuals cannot generate accurate syntactic representations of passive sentences and, hence, use an agent-first processing strategy which leads to at-chance performance. We tested this claim using the eye tracking-while-listening paradigm in order to reveal online processing routines. Ten agrammatic aphasic participants and 10 age-matched controls listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture matching task (i.e., selecting between two pictures with reversed thematic roles), while their eye movements were monitored. Control participants' performance was at ceiling, whereas accuracy for the aphasic participants was above chance for active sentences and at chance for passive sentences. Further, for the control participants, the eye movement data showed an initial agent-first processing bias, followed by fixation on the correct picture in the vicinity of the verb in both active and passive sentences. However, the aphasic participants showed no evidence of agent-first processing, counter the predictions of the TDH. In addition, in active sentences, they reliably fixated the correct picture only at sentence offset, reflecting slowed processing. During passive sentence processing, fixations were at chance throughout the sentence, but different patterns were noted for correct and incorrect trials. These results are consistent with the proposal that agrammatic sentence comprehension failure involves lexical processing and/or lexical integration deficits.

KW - Agent-first strategy

KW - Agrammatic aphasia

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Online sentence processing

KW - Passive sentences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054844135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054844135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 31

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics

JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics

SN - 0911-6044

IS - 1

ER -