Traditional versus new needle retractable IV catheters in children: Are they really safer, and whom are they protecting?

Charles J. Coté*, Andrew G. Roth, Melissa Wheeler, Carolyn Ter Rahe, Bronwyn R. Rae, Richard M. Dsida, H. J. Przybylo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


Retractable needle IV catheters are designed to reduce needle-stick injuries; their use is mandated by federal regulations. We undertook a prospective data collection with the "traditional" IV catheters (JELCO) versus the "new (Angiocath™ Autoguard™). Assignment of catheter type was randomized by week. Data collected included assessment of the difficulty of IV access; number of catheters used; and splatters or spills of blood on skin, linen, floor, clothing, and operating room table. There were 473 attempted insertions in 330 patients over 20 days. No needle-stick injuries occurred. Seventy-seven blood spills or splatters occurred in 42 patients. The number of splatters or spills was four times more with the new compared with the traditional catheters. There were significantly more total splatters or spills and patients who experienced splatters or spills with new catheters when they were placed by attendings but not when placed by trainees. Our study suggests that use of this technology by more experienced anesthesiologists may increase the risk of exposure of health care providers to blood-borne pathogens. Practitioners should choose the IV system that allows the most efficient venous access with the least potential for blood contamination. Hospitals should allow the choice to be made by the individuals using the devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-391
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional versus new needle retractable IV catheters in children: Are they really safer, and whom are they protecting?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this