Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients

Michael J. Mack, Martin B. Leon, Vinod H. Thourani, Raj Makkar, Susheel K. Kodali, Mark Russo, Samir R. Kapadia, S. Chris Malaisrie, David J. Cohen, Philippe Pibarot, Jonathon Leipsic, Rebecca T. Hahn, Philipp Blanke, Mathew R. Williams, James M. McCabe, David L. Brown, Vasilis Babaliaros, Scott Goldman, Wilson Y. Szeto, Philippe GenereuxAshish Pershad, Stuart J. Pocock, Maria C. Alu, John G. Webb, Craig R. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2578 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND Among patients with aortic stenosis who are at intermediate or high risk for death with surgery, major outcomes are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement. There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparison of the two procedures in patients who are at low risk. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either TAVR with transfemoral placement of a balloon-expandable valve or surgery. The primary end point was a composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year. Both noninferiority testing (with a prespecified margin of 6 percentage points) and superiority testing were performed in the as-treated population. RESULTS At 71 centers, 1000 patients underwent randomization. The mean age of the patients was 73 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 1.9% (with scores ranging from 0 to 100% and higher scores indicating a greater risk of death within 30 days after the procedure). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the rate of the primary composite end point at 1 year was significantly lower in the TAVR group than in the surgery group (8.5% vs. 15.1%; absolute difference, −6.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −10.8 to −2.5; P<0.001 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79; P=0.001 for superiority). At 30 days, TAVR resulted in a lower rate of stroke than surgery (P=0.02) and in lower rates of death or stroke (P=0.01) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (P<0.001). TAVR also resulted in a shorter index hospitalization than surgery (P<0.001) and in a lower risk of a poor treatment outcome (death or a low Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) at 30 days (P<0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in major vascular complications, new permanent pacemaker insertions, or moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at low surgical risk, the rate of the composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year was significantly lower with TAVR than with surgery. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PARTNER 3 number, NCT02675114.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1695-1705
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number18
StatePublished - May 2 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this