Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase

Camila Shirota*, Annie Simon, Todd A Kuiken

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Recovering from trips is challenging for transfemoral amputees, and attempts often result in falls. Better understanding of the effects of the sensory-motor deficits brought by amputation and the functional limitations of prosthetic devices could help guide therapy and fall prevention mechanisms in prostheses. However, how transfemoral amputees attempt to recover from trips on the sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase is poorly understood. Methods: We tripped eight able-bodied subjects and eight unilateral transfemoral amputees wearing their prescribed prostheses. The protocol consisted of six repetitions of 6 and 4 points throughout swing phase, respectively. We compared recovery strategies in able-bodied, sound side and prosthesis side limbs. The number of kinematic recovery strategies used, when they were used throughout swing phase, and kinematic characteristics (tripped limb joint angles, bilateral trochanter height and time from foot arrest to foot strike) of each strategy were compared across limb groups. Non-parametric statistical tests with corrections for post-hoc tests were used. Results: Amputees used the same recovery strategies as able-bodied subjects on both sound and prosthesis sides, although not all subjects used all strategies. Compared to able-bodied subjects, amputees used delayed-lowering strategies less often from 30-60 % of swing phase on the sound side, and from 45-60 % of swing phase on the prosthesis side. Within-strategy kinematic differences occurred across limbs; however, these differences were not consistent across all strategies. Amputee-specific recovery strategies - that are not used by control subjects - occurred following trips on both the sound and prosthesis sides in mid- to late swing. Conclusions: Collectively, these results suggest that sensory input from the distal tripped leg is not necessary to trigger able-bodied trip recovery strategies. In addition, the differences between sound and prosthesis side recoveries indicate that the ability of the support leg might be more critical than that of the tripped leg when determining the response to a trip. The outcomes of this study have implications for prosthesis control, suggesting that providing correct and intuitive real-time selection of typical able-bodied recovery strategies by a prosthetic device when it is the tripped and the support limb could better enable balance recovery and avoid falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number67
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this