TY - JOUR
T1 - Transnational identity and the Gulf crisis
T2 - Changing narratives of belonging in Qatar
AU - Mitchell, Jocelyn Sage
N1 - Funding Information:
This article is part of the special section in the July 2021 issue of International Affairs on ‘International Relations and transnational politics in the GCC reconsidered’, edited by Courtney Freer, Jessie Moritz and Emma Soubrier. Support for this research was provided by a grant (NPRP 8-389-5-051) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) and funds for research assistance from Northwestern University in Qatar. The author thanks these institutions for their support and notes that all statements made herein are solely the author's responsibility. Special thanks go to research assistants in 2019 (Lulwa Al-Khori, Iffah Kitchlew and Roja Pande) and 2018 (Ömer Alaoui, Jawaher AlMoawda and Ayman Al-Rachid) for their ethnographic interviews. The author also thanks Mariam Al-Hammadi, Ilhem Allagui, Scott Curtis and Natalie Koch, the organizers and participants of the workshop ‘Emerging challenges in international relations and transnational politics of the GCC’ at the 2019 Gulf Research Meeting, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their feedback and guidance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - What does the recent Gulf diplomatic crisis of June 2017 to January 2021 mean for the future of the region's signature transnationalism: the khalījī [Gulf] identity? This identity narrative encompasses the shared sociocultural backgrounds of the people of the region, but the unprecedented separations, caused by the regional crisis, may have shifted the discourse of belonging in the Gulf. To investigate the impact of the recent crisis on regional identity narratives, this article explores the new National Museum of Qatar's presentation of Qatar's political history from 1848 to 1868, as well as museum-goers' reactions to this presentation, through original fieldwork and ethnographic interviews with Qatari and expatriate residents. The analysis highlights the museum's purposeful portrayal of parallels between intra-Gulf conflicts of the past and the recent crisis, a presentational choice that stands in sharp contrast to previous regional norms of tactful diplomacy. Further, museum-goers recognized the linguistic and symbolic parallels, provoking both engagement with and rejection of the concept of khalījī identity. In summary, this analysis suggests that the crisis has shifted the norms of discourse in the region in ways that may make social reconciliation difficult, even as political bonds resume. As the region moves forward from crisis, policy-makers should reduce the tension between national and transnational identity narratives by creating space for the renewal of khalījī ties.
AB - What does the recent Gulf diplomatic crisis of June 2017 to January 2021 mean for the future of the region's signature transnationalism: the khalījī [Gulf] identity? This identity narrative encompasses the shared sociocultural backgrounds of the people of the region, but the unprecedented separations, caused by the regional crisis, may have shifted the discourse of belonging in the Gulf. To investigate the impact of the recent crisis on regional identity narratives, this article explores the new National Museum of Qatar's presentation of Qatar's political history from 1848 to 1868, as well as museum-goers' reactions to this presentation, through original fieldwork and ethnographic interviews with Qatari and expatriate residents. The analysis highlights the museum's purposeful portrayal of parallels between intra-Gulf conflicts of the past and the recent crisis, a presentational choice that stands in sharp contrast to previous regional norms of tactful diplomacy. Further, museum-goers recognized the linguistic and symbolic parallels, provoking both engagement with and rejection of the concept of khalījī identity. In summary, this analysis suggests that the crisis has shifted the norms of discourse in the region in ways that may make social reconciliation difficult, even as political bonds resume. As the region moves forward from crisis, policy-makers should reduce the tension between national and transnational identity narratives by creating space for the renewal of khalījī ties.
KW - culture and politics/IR
KW - domestic politics
KW - Middle East
KW - nationalism
KW - regionalism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110745615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110745615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ia/iiab013
DO - 10.1093/ia/iiab013
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85110745615
SN - 0020-5850
VL - 97
SP - 929
EP - 944
JO - International Affairs
JF - International Affairs
IS - 4
ER -