TY - JOUR
T1 - Transpapillary drainage has no added benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts
T2 - A large multicenter study
AU - Yang, Dennis
AU - Amin, Sunil
AU - Gonzalez, Susana
AU - Mullady, Daniel
AU - Hasak, Stephen
AU - Gaddam, Srinivas
AU - Edmundowicz, Steven A.
AU - Gromski, Mark A.
AU - Dewitt, John M.
AU - El Zein, Mohamad
AU - Khashab, Mouen A.
AU - Wang, Andrew Y.
AU - Gaspar, Jonathan P.
AU - Uppal, Dushant S.
AU - Nagula, Satish
AU - Kapadia, Samir
AU - Buscaglia, Jonathan M.
AU - Bucobo, Juan Carlos
AU - Schlachterman, Alex
AU - Wagh, Mihir S.
AU - Draganov, Peter V.
AU - Jung, Min Kyu
AU - Stevens, Tyler
AU - Vargo, John J.
AU - Khara, Harshit S.
AU - Huseini, Mustafa
AU - Diehl, David L.
AU - Keswani, Rajesh N.
AU - Law, Ryan
AU - Komanduri, Srinadh
AU - Yachimski, Patrick S.
AU - Davee, Tomas
AU - Prabhu, Anoop
AU - Lapp, Robert T.
AU - Kwon, Richard S.
AU - Watson, Rabindra R.
AU - Goodman, Adam J.
AU - Chhabra, Natasha
AU - Wang, Wallace J.
AU - Benias, Petros
AU - Carr-Locke, David L.
AU - Dimaio, Christopher J.
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURES: Dr Wang receives research funding from Cook Medical. Dr Edmundowicz is a consultant for Olympus America and Boston Scientific and receives research funding from Boston Scientific. Dr Khashab is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Yachimski is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Keswani is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. Dr Vargo is a consultant for Covidien. Dr Law is a consultant for Covidien Dr Stevens is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr DiMaio is a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Background and Aims The need for transpapillary drainage (TPD) in patients undergoing transmural drainage (TMD) of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with pancreatic pseudocysts undergoing TMD versus combined (TMD and TPD) drainage (CD) and to identify predictors of symptomatic and radiologic resolution. Methods This is a retrospective review of 375 consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided TMD from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TMD and CD technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution) at follow-up, and predictors of treatment outcomes on logistic regression. Results A total of 375 patients underwent EUS-guided TMD of PFCs, of which 174 were pseudocysts. TMD alone was performed in 95 (55%) and CD in 79 (45%) pseudocysts. Technical success was as follows: TMD, 92 (97%) versus CD, 35 (44%) (P =.0001). There was no difference in adverse events between the TMD (15%) and CD (14%) cohorts (P =.23). Median long-term (LT) follow-up after transmural stent removal was 324 days (interquartile range, 72-493 days) for TMD and 201 days (interquartile range, 150-493 days) (P =.37). There was no difference in LT symptomatic resolution (TMD, 69% vs CD, 62%; P =.61) or LT radiologic resolution (TMD, 71% vs CD, 67%; P =.79). TPD attempt was negatively associated with LT radiologic resolution of pseudocyst (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.8; P =.03). Conclusions TPD has no benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided TMD of pancreatic pseudocysts and negatively affects LT resolution of PFCs.
AB - Background and Aims The need for transpapillary drainage (TPD) in patients undergoing transmural drainage (TMD) of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with pancreatic pseudocysts undergoing TMD versus combined (TMD and TPD) drainage (CD) and to identify predictors of symptomatic and radiologic resolution. Methods This is a retrospective review of 375 consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided TMD from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TMD and CD technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution) at follow-up, and predictors of treatment outcomes on logistic regression. Results A total of 375 patients underwent EUS-guided TMD of PFCs, of which 174 were pseudocysts. TMD alone was performed in 95 (55%) and CD in 79 (45%) pseudocysts. Technical success was as follows: TMD, 92 (97%) versus CD, 35 (44%) (P =.0001). There was no difference in adverse events between the TMD (15%) and CD (14%) cohorts (P =.23). Median long-term (LT) follow-up after transmural stent removal was 324 days (interquartile range, 72-493 days) for TMD and 201 days (interquartile range, 150-493 days) (P =.37). There was no difference in LT symptomatic resolution (TMD, 69% vs CD, 62%; P =.61) or LT radiologic resolution (TMD, 71% vs CD, 67%; P =.79). TPD attempt was negatively associated with LT radiologic resolution of pseudocyst (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.8; P =.03). Conclusions TPD has no benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided TMD of pancreatic pseudocysts and negatively affects LT resolution of PFCs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960314231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960314231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.040
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 26548849
AN - SCOPUS:84960314231
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 83
SP - 720
EP - 729
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 4
ER -