Treating Depression in Predominantly Low-Income Young Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jeanne Miranda*, Joyce Y. Chung, Bonnie L. Green, Janice Krupnick, Juned Siddique, Dennis A. Revicki, Tom Belin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

423 Scopus citations


Context: Impoverished minority women experience a higher burden from depression than do white women because they are less likely to receive appropriate care. Little is known about the effectiveness of guideline-based care for depression with impoverished minority women, most of whom do not seek care. Objective: To determine the impact of an intervention to deliver guideline-based care for depression compared with referral to community care with low-income and minority women. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized controlled trial conducted in the Washington, DC, suburban area from March 1997 through May 2002 of 267 women with current major depression, who attended county-run Women, Infants, and Children food subsidy programs and Title X family planning clinics. Outcomes: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measured monthly from baseline through 6 months; instrumental role functioning (Social Adjustment Scale) and social functioning (Short Form 36-Item Health Survey) measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to an antidepressant medication intervention (trial of paroxetine switched to buproprion, if lack of response) (n = 88), a psychotherapy intervention (8 weeks of manual-guided cognitive behavior therapy) (n=90), or referral to community mental health services (n=89). Results: Both the medication intervention (P<.001) and the psychotherapy intervention (P=.006) reduced depressive symptoms more than the community referral did. The medication intervention also resulted in improved instrumental role (P=.006) and social (P=.001) functioning. The psychotherapy intervention resulted in improved social functioning (P=.02). Women randomly assigned to receive medications were twice as likely (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-4.27; P=.057) to achieve a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 7 or less by month 6 as were those referred to community care. Conclusions: Guideline-concordant care for major depression is effective for these ethnically diverse and impoverished patients. More women engaged in a sufficient duration of treatment with medications compared with psychotherapy, and outcome gains were more extensive and robust for medications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 2 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Treating Depression in Predominantly Low-Income Young Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this