TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment fidelity procedures for an aphasia intervention within a randomized controlled trial
T2 - Design, feasibility, and results
AU - Conlon, Elissa L.
AU - Braun, Emily J.
AU - Babbitt, Edna M.
AU - Cherney, Leora R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Grant 90RT5027 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the efforts and assistance of the research assistants who completed the protocol adherence reviews, Daniella Roth and Lauren Siragusa.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: This study reports on the treatment fidelity procedures implemented during a 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing intensive and distributed comprehensive aphasia therapy. Specifically, the results of 1 treatment, verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST), are examined. Method: Eight participants were recruited for each of 7 consecutive cohorts for a total of 56 participants. Participants completed 60 hr of aphasia therapy, including 15 hr of VNeST. Two experienced speech-language pathologists delivered the treatment. To promote treatment fidelity, the study team developed a detailed manual of procedures and fidelity checklists, completed role plays to standardize treatment administration, and video-recorded all treatment sessions for review. To assess protocol adherence during treatment delivery, trained research assistants not involved in the treatment reviewed video recordings of a subset of randomly selected VNeST treatment sessions and completed the fidelity checklists. This process was completed for 32 participants representing 2 early cohorts and 2 later cohorts, which allowed for measurement of protocol adherence over time. Percent accuracy of protocol adherence was calculated across clinicians, cohorts, and study condition (intensive vs. distributed therapy). Results: The fidelity procedures were sufficient to promote and verify a high level of adherence to the treatment protocol across clinicians, cohorts, and study condition. Conclusion: Treatment fidelity strategies and monitoring are feasible when incorporated into the study design. Treatment fidelity monitoring should be completed at regular intervals during the course of a study to ensure that high levels of protocol adherence are maintained over time and across conditions.
AB - Purpose: This study reports on the treatment fidelity procedures implemented during a 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing intensive and distributed comprehensive aphasia therapy. Specifically, the results of 1 treatment, verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST), are examined. Method: Eight participants were recruited for each of 7 consecutive cohorts for a total of 56 participants. Participants completed 60 hr of aphasia therapy, including 15 hr of VNeST. Two experienced speech-language pathologists delivered the treatment. To promote treatment fidelity, the study team developed a detailed manual of procedures and fidelity checklists, completed role plays to standardize treatment administration, and video-recorded all treatment sessions for review. To assess protocol adherence during treatment delivery, trained research assistants not involved in the treatment reviewed video recordings of a subset of randomly selected VNeST treatment sessions and completed the fidelity checklists. This process was completed for 32 participants representing 2 early cohorts and 2 later cohorts, which allowed for measurement of protocol adherence over time. Percent accuracy of protocol adherence was calculated across clinicians, cohorts, and study condition (intensive vs. distributed therapy). Results: The fidelity procedures were sufficient to promote and verify a high level of adherence to the treatment protocol across clinicians, cohorts, and study condition. Conclusion: Treatment fidelity strategies and monitoring are feasible when incorporated into the study design. Treatment fidelity monitoring should be completed at regular intervals during the course of a study to ensure that high levels of protocol adherence are maintained over time and across conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080851039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080851039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0227
DO - 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0227
M3 - Article
C2 - 31419155
AN - SCOPUS:85080851039
SN - 1058-0360
VL - 29
SP - 412
EP - 424
JO - American journal of speech-language pathology
JF - American journal of speech-language pathology
IS - 1 Special Issue
ER -