TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of extensively-drug resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter and impact on clinical outcomes in U.S. veterans affairs (VA) medical centers
AU - Fitzpatrick, Margaret A.
AU - Suda, Katie J.
AU - Poggensee, Linda
AU - Vivo, Amanda
AU - Wilson, Geneva
AU - Jones, Makoto M.
AU - Evans, Martin
AU - Safdar, Nasia
AU - Evans, Charlesnika T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/support: This work was supported by The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development ( IIR 16-028 to C.T.E ), Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award ( B2826-W to M.A.F. ), and Research Career Scientist ( RCS 20-192 to C.T.E. ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: Guidelines for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) are limited, leaving a knowledge gap in best practices for treatment. This study described treatments and outcomes of extensively-drug resistant (XDR) AB. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients with XDRAB (non-susceptible to at least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer classes) and antibiotic treatment between 2012 and 2018 at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Descriptive statistics summarized antibiotics; propensity score adjusted regression models were fit to compare outcomes. Results: Two hundred and seventy-six patients with 439 XDRAB cultures and Gram-negative targeted antibiotic treatment were included. One hundred and eighteen (43%) patients received monotherapy while 158 (57%) received combination therapy, most commonly including a carbapenem (n = 106, 67%) and polymyxin (n = 66, 42%). One hundred and eighty-four (67%) patients received inadequate treatment. In adjusted models, combination therapy did not decrease the odds of in-hospital (aOR 1.24, 95%CI 0.60-2.59) or 30-day (aOR 1.43, 95%CI 0.86-2.38) mortality, or median postculture length of stay (aIRR 1.11, 95%CI 0.86-1.43). Likewise, receipt of inadequate treatment was not associated with poorer outcomes. Conclusions: In this national cohort of patients with XDRAB, neither combination therapy nor receipt of adequate treatment improved outcomes. Further research is needed on optimal management of this difficult-to-treat pathogen with few effective antibiotic options.
AB - Background: Guidelines for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) are limited, leaving a knowledge gap in best practices for treatment. This study described treatments and outcomes of extensively-drug resistant (XDR) AB. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients with XDRAB (non-susceptible to at least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer classes) and antibiotic treatment between 2012 and 2018 at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Descriptive statistics summarized antibiotics; propensity score adjusted regression models were fit to compare outcomes. Results: Two hundred and seventy-six patients with 439 XDRAB cultures and Gram-negative targeted antibiotic treatment were included. One hundred and eighteen (43%) patients received monotherapy while 158 (57%) received combination therapy, most commonly including a carbapenem (n = 106, 67%) and polymyxin (n = 66, 42%). One hundred and eighty-four (67%) patients received inadequate treatment. In adjusted models, combination therapy did not decrease the odds of in-hospital (aOR 1.24, 95%CI 0.60-2.59) or 30-day (aOR 1.43, 95%CI 0.86-2.38) mortality, or median postculture length of stay (aIRR 1.11, 95%CI 0.86-1.43). Likewise, receipt of inadequate treatment was not associated with poorer outcomes. Conclusions: In this national cohort of patients with XDRAB, neither combination therapy nor receipt of adequate treatment improved outcomes. Further research is needed on optimal management of this difficult-to-treat pathogen with few effective antibiotic options.
KW - Acinetobacter
KW - Antibiotic
KW - Gram-negative
KW - Multidrug resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126524781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126524781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 35108579
AN - SCOPUS:85126524781
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 50
SP - 1020
EP - 1025
JO - American Journal of Infection Control
JF - American Journal of Infection Control
IS - 9
ER -