TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of Fabry's disease with the pharmacologic chaperone migalastat
AU - Germain, D. P.
AU - Hughes, D. A.
AU - Nicholls, K.
AU - Bichet, D. G.
AU - Giugliani, R.
AU - Wilcox, W. R.
AU - Feliciani, C.
AU - Shankar, S. P.
AU - Ezgu, F.
AU - Amartino, H.
AU - Bratkovic, D.
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, U.
AU - Nedd, K.
AU - Sharaf El Din, U.
AU - Lourenco, C. M.
AU - Banikazemi, M.
AU - Charrow, J.
AU - Dasouki, M.
AU - Finegold, D.
AU - Giraldo, P.
AU - Goker-Alpan, O.
AU - Longo, N.
AU - Scott, C. R.
AU - Torra, R.
AU - Tuffaha, A.
AU - Jovanovic, A.
AU - Waldek, S.
AU - Packman, S.
AU - Ludington, E.
AU - Viereck, C.
AU - Kirk, J.
AU - Yu, J.
AU - Benjamin, E. R.
AU - Johnson, F.
AU - Lockhart, D. J.
AU - Skuban, N.
AU - Castelli, J.
AU - Barth, J.
AU - Barlow, C.
AU - Schiffmann, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2016/8/11
Y1 - 2016/8/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: Fabry's disease, an X-linked disorder of lysosomal α-galactosidase deficiency, leads to substrate accumulation in multiple organs. Migalastat, an oral pharmacologic chaperone, stabilizes specific mutant forms of α-galactosidase, increasing enzyme trafficking to lysosomes. METHODS: The initial assay of mutant α-galactosidase forms that we used to categorize 67 patients with Fabry's disease for randomization to 6 months of double-blind migalastat or placebo (stage 1), followed by open-label migalastat from 6 to 12 months (stage 2) plus an additional year, had certain limitations. Before unblinding, a new, validated assay showed that 50 of the 67 participants had mutant α-galactosidase forms suitable for targeting by migalastat. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who had a response (≥50% reduction in the number of globotriaosylceramide inclusions per kidney interstitial capillary) at 6 months. We assessed safety along with disease substrates and renal, cardiovascular, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The primary end-point analysis, involving patients with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy, did not show a significant treatment effect: 13 of 32 patients (41%) who received migalastat and 9 of 32 patients (28%) who received placebo had a response at 6 months (P=0.30). Among patients with suitable mutant α-galactosidase who received migalastat for up to 24 months, the annualized changes from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and measured GFR were -0.30±0.66 and -1.51±1.33 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area, respectively. The left-ventricular-mass index decreased significantly from baseline (-7.7 g per square meter; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.4 to -0.01), particularly when left ventricular hypertrophy was present (-18.6 g per square meter; 95% CI, -38.2 to 1.0). The severity of diarrhea, reflux, and indigestion decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Among all randomly assigned patients (with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy), the percentage of patients who had a response at 6 months did not differ significantly between the migalastat group and the placebo group.
AB - BACKGROUND: Fabry's disease, an X-linked disorder of lysosomal α-galactosidase deficiency, leads to substrate accumulation in multiple organs. Migalastat, an oral pharmacologic chaperone, stabilizes specific mutant forms of α-galactosidase, increasing enzyme trafficking to lysosomes. METHODS: The initial assay of mutant α-galactosidase forms that we used to categorize 67 patients with Fabry's disease for randomization to 6 months of double-blind migalastat or placebo (stage 1), followed by open-label migalastat from 6 to 12 months (stage 2) plus an additional year, had certain limitations. Before unblinding, a new, validated assay showed that 50 of the 67 participants had mutant α-galactosidase forms suitable for targeting by migalastat. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who had a response (≥50% reduction in the number of globotriaosylceramide inclusions per kidney interstitial capillary) at 6 months. We assessed safety along with disease substrates and renal, cardiovascular, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The primary end-point analysis, involving patients with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy, did not show a significant treatment effect: 13 of 32 patients (41%) who received migalastat and 9 of 32 patients (28%) who received placebo had a response at 6 months (P=0.30). Among patients with suitable mutant α-galactosidase who received migalastat for up to 24 months, the annualized changes from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and measured GFR were -0.30±0.66 and -1.51±1.33 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area, respectively. The left-ventricular-mass index decreased significantly from baseline (-7.7 g per square meter; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.4 to -0.01), particularly when left ventricular hypertrophy was present (-18.6 g per square meter; 95% CI, -38.2 to 1.0). The severity of diarrhea, reflux, and indigestion decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Among all randomly assigned patients (with mutant α-galactosidase forms that were suitable or not suitable for migalastat therapy), the percentage of patients who had a response at 6 months did not differ significantly between the migalastat group and the placebo group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981742779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981742779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1510198
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1510198
M3 - Article
C2 - 27509102
AN - SCOPUS:84981742779
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 375
SP - 545
EP - 555
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 6
ER -