TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Influence Rates of Sustained Virologic Response
T2 - An HCV-TARGET Analysis
AU - Radhakrishnan, Kavita
AU - Di Bisceglie, Adrian M.
AU - Reddy, K. Rajender
AU - Lim, Joseph K.
AU - Levitsky, Josh
AU - Hassan, Mohamed A.
AU - Darling, Jama M.
AU - Feld, Jordan J.
AU - Akushevich, Lucy
AU - Vainorius, Monika
AU - Nelson, David R.
AU - Fried, Michael W.
AU - Brown, Robert S.
AU - Terrault, Norah A.
N1 - Funding Information:
HCV-TARGET is a longitudinal, observational study of chronic hepatitis C patients that began in December 2011 and is ongoing. This consortium includes academic (n = 46) and community (n = 16) centers from North America (n = 58) and Europe (n = 4), collecting data on DAA regimens and outcomes in this rapidly changing therapeutic area. Prospective data are captured from enrolled patients using a common database that uses novel, standardized source data abstraction as described previously.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Recent studies have suggested a negative impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct acting antivirals (DAAs). We compared the effectiveness of DAAs in patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC, and in those with HCC partially treated or untreated (PT/UT-HCC) versus completely treated (CT-HCC). HCC status was based on imaging 6 months before or 2 months after start of DAA therapy. Absence and presence of enhancing lesions after HCC treatment defined CT-HCC and PT/UT-HCC, respectively. Using minimally adjusted logistic regression, the association between the presence of HCC and SVR rates was estimated. Among the 1,457 patients with cirrhosis from HCV-TARGET with complete virologic data (per-protocol population) who did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment and followup, 1,300 were without HCC, 91 with CT-HCC, and 66 with PT/UT-HCC. Most patients were genotype 1 (81%) and treatment-experienced (56%), 41% had history of prior decompensation, and the median pretreatment Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 9 (range 6-39). The SVR rates were 91% for patients without HCC, 84% for CT-HCC, and 80% for PT/UT-HCC. The presence of HCC (versus not having HCC) was associated with significantly lower odds of achieving SVR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.81; P = 0.003). However, among those with HCC, HCC treatment status (PT/UT-HCC versus CT-HCC) did not show association with SVR (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.35-1.79, P = 0.569). Conclusions: The presence of HCC reduces the likelihood of SVR by 50%, but with no evident difference in those with completely treated HCC versus partially treated/untreated HCC.
AB - Recent studies have suggested a negative impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct acting antivirals (DAAs). We compared the effectiveness of DAAs in patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC, and in those with HCC partially treated or untreated (PT/UT-HCC) versus completely treated (CT-HCC). HCC status was based on imaging 6 months before or 2 months after start of DAA therapy. Absence and presence of enhancing lesions after HCC treatment defined CT-HCC and PT/UT-HCC, respectively. Using minimally adjusted logistic regression, the association between the presence of HCC and SVR rates was estimated. Among the 1,457 patients with cirrhosis from HCV-TARGET with complete virologic data (per-protocol population) who did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment and followup, 1,300 were without HCC, 91 with CT-HCC, and 66 with PT/UT-HCC. Most patients were genotype 1 (81%) and treatment-experienced (56%), 41% had history of prior decompensation, and the median pretreatment Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 9 (range 6-39). The SVR rates were 91% for patients without HCC, 84% for CT-HCC, and 80% for PT/UT-HCC. The presence of HCC (versus not having HCC) was associated with significantly lower odds of achieving SVR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.81; P = 0.003). However, among those with HCC, HCC treatment status (PT/UT-HCC versus CT-HCC) did not show association with SVR (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.35-1.79, P = 0.569). Conclusions: The presence of HCC reduces the likelihood of SVR by 50%, but with no evident difference in those with completely treated HCC versus partially treated/untreated HCC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079824794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079824794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hep4.1412
DO - 10.1002/hep4.1412
M3 - Article
C2 - 31592494
AN - SCOPUS:85079824794
SN - 2471-254X
VL - 3
SP - 1388
EP - 1399
JO - Hepatology Communications
JF - Hepatology Communications
IS - 10
ER -