TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends and predictors of multidimensional health-related quality of life after living donor kidney transplantation
AU - Peipert, John D.
AU - Caicedo, Juan Carlos
AU - Friedewald, John J.
AU - Abecassis, Michael M.I.
AU - Cella, David
AU - Ladner, Daniela P.
AU - Butt, Zeeshan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Purpose: Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) imparts the best graft and patient survival for most end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Yet, there remains variation in post-LDKT health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Improved understanding of post-LDKT HRQOL can help identify patients for interventions to maximize the benefit of LDKT. Methods: For 477 LDKT recipients transplanted between 11/2007 and 08/2016, we assessed physical, mental, social, and kidney-targeted HRQOL pre-LDKT, as well as 3 and 12 months post-operatively using the SF-36, Kidney Disease Quality of Life—Short Form (KDQOL-SF), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Kidney Symptom Index 19 item version (FKSI-19). We then examined trajectories of each HRQOL domain using latent growth curve models (LGCMs). We also examined associations between decline in HRQOL from 3 months to 12 months post-LDKT and death censored graft failure (DCGF) using Cox regression. Results: Large magnitude effects (d > 0.80) were observed from pre- to post-LDKT change on the SF-36 Vitality scale (d = 0.81) and the KDQOL-SF Burden of Kidney Disease (d = 1.05). Older age and smaller pre- to post-LDKT decreases in serum creatinine were associated with smaller improvements on many HRQOL scales across all domains in LGCMs. Higher DCGF rates were associated with worse physical [e.g., SF-36 PCSoblique hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% CI 1.01–1.38], mental (KDQOL-SF Cognitive Function HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00–1.62), and kidney-targeted (FKSI-19 HR: 1.18; 95% CI 1.00–1.38) HRQOL domains. Conclusion: Clinical HRQOL monitoring may help identify patients who are most likely to have failing grafts and who would benefit from post-LDKT intervention.
AB - Purpose: Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) imparts the best graft and patient survival for most end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Yet, there remains variation in post-LDKT health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Improved understanding of post-LDKT HRQOL can help identify patients for interventions to maximize the benefit of LDKT. Methods: For 477 LDKT recipients transplanted between 11/2007 and 08/2016, we assessed physical, mental, social, and kidney-targeted HRQOL pre-LDKT, as well as 3 and 12 months post-operatively using the SF-36, Kidney Disease Quality of Life—Short Form (KDQOL-SF), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Kidney Symptom Index 19 item version (FKSI-19). We then examined trajectories of each HRQOL domain using latent growth curve models (LGCMs). We also examined associations between decline in HRQOL from 3 months to 12 months post-LDKT and death censored graft failure (DCGF) using Cox regression. Results: Large magnitude effects (d > 0.80) were observed from pre- to post-LDKT change on the SF-36 Vitality scale (d = 0.81) and the KDQOL-SF Burden of Kidney Disease (d = 1.05). Older age and smaller pre- to post-LDKT decreases in serum creatinine were associated with smaller improvements on many HRQOL scales across all domains in LGCMs. Higher DCGF rates were associated with worse physical [e.g., SF-36 PCSoblique hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% CI 1.01–1.38], mental (KDQOL-SF Cognitive Function HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00–1.62), and kidney-targeted (FKSI-19 HR: 1.18; 95% CI 1.00–1.38) HRQOL domains. Conclusion: Clinical HRQOL monitoring may help identify patients who are most likely to have failing grafts and who would benefit from post-LDKT intervention.
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Kidney transplant
KW - Living donor
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083776258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083776258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-020-02498-2
DO - 10.1007/s11136-020-02498-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32285345
AN - SCOPUS:85083776258
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 29
SP - 2355
EP - 2374
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 9
ER -