TY - JOUR
T1 - Truth or Myth
T2 - Intra-abdominal Pressure Increases in the Lithotomy Position
AU - Young, Karen
AU - Mou, Tsung
AU - Geynisman-Tan, Julia
AU - Tavathia, Meera
AU - Collins, Sarah
AU - Mueller, Margaret
AU - Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
AU - Kenton, Kimberly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AAGL
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Study Objective: To determine if there were differences in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in the supine, low lithotomy, and high lithotomy positions. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: University medical center. Patients: Twenty-nine women undergoing surgery for prolapse or stress incontinence. Interventions: Relevant medical history, including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage, body mass index, and airway grade (Mallampati score), was abstracted from patients’ medical charts. IAP was measured in centimeters of water (cmH2O) on the day of their surgery before induction of general or intravenous anesthesia using a T-doc air charged urodynamic catheter (Laborie Aquarius; Ontario, Canada) placed in a patient's vagina (for patients with incontinence) or rectum (for patients with prolapse). Measurements and Main Results: IAP was measured in 3 positions: supine (legs at 0°), low lithotomy (legs in Yellowfin stirrups at 45°; Allen Medical, Acton, MA), and high lithotomy (legs at 90°). The means ± SDs IAP for the groups were as follows: in the supine position, 18.6 cmH2O ± 7.6; low lithotomy, 17.7 cmH2O ± 6.6; and high lithotomy, 17.1 cmH2O ± 6.3. In the same women, there was a significant decrease in IAP from the supine to high lithotomy positions, with a mean difference of 1.4 cmH2O ± 3.7, p =.05. Similarly, there was a significant, though smaller, decrease in mean IAP when moving from the supine to low lithotomy positions in these same women (mean decrease of 0.9 cmH2O ± 1.5, p =.004). Neither change is clinically significant based on previous research that suggests 5 cmH2O is a clinically significant change. Conclusion: Placing patients’ legs in a low or high lithotomy position does not result in a clinically significant increase in IAP. Therefore, surgeons and anesthesiologists can consider positioning patients’ lower extremities in stirrups while patients are awake to minimize discomfort and possibly reduce the risk of nerve injuries.
AB - Study Objective: To determine if there were differences in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in the supine, low lithotomy, and high lithotomy positions. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: University medical center. Patients: Twenty-nine women undergoing surgery for prolapse or stress incontinence. Interventions: Relevant medical history, including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage, body mass index, and airway grade (Mallampati score), was abstracted from patients’ medical charts. IAP was measured in centimeters of water (cmH2O) on the day of their surgery before induction of general or intravenous anesthesia using a T-doc air charged urodynamic catheter (Laborie Aquarius; Ontario, Canada) placed in a patient's vagina (for patients with incontinence) or rectum (for patients with prolapse). Measurements and Main Results: IAP was measured in 3 positions: supine (legs at 0°), low lithotomy (legs in Yellowfin stirrups at 45°; Allen Medical, Acton, MA), and high lithotomy (legs at 90°). The means ± SDs IAP for the groups were as follows: in the supine position, 18.6 cmH2O ± 7.6; low lithotomy, 17.7 cmH2O ± 6.6; and high lithotomy, 17.1 cmH2O ± 6.3. In the same women, there was a significant decrease in IAP from the supine to high lithotomy positions, with a mean difference of 1.4 cmH2O ± 3.7, p =.05. Similarly, there was a significant, though smaller, decrease in mean IAP when moving from the supine to low lithotomy positions in these same women (mean decrease of 0.9 cmH2O ± 1.5, p =.004). Neither change is clinically significant based on previous research that suggests 5 cmH2O is a clinically significant change. Conclusion: Placing patients’ legs in a low or high lithotomy position does not result in a clinically significant increase in IAP. Therefore, surgeons and anesthesiologists can consider positioning patients’ lower extremities in stirrups while patients are awake to minimize discomfort and possibly reduce the risk of nerve injuries.
KW - Intraabdominal pressure
KW - Nerve injury
KW - Patient safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083671248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083671248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 32229258
AN - SCOPUS:85083671248
VL - 28
SP - 26
EP - 29
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
SN - 1553-4650
IS - 1
ER -