Turning Points in the Galesburg Debate

David Zarefsky*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Galesburg, the fifth of the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858, marked a strategic turning point in the series, when the momentum of the debates shifted from Stephen A. Douglas to Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln established a lead on the argument about the hypothetical Dred Scott II future Supreme Court decision, the moral argument about slavery, the argument about the 1854 Republican platform, and in the use of refutation strategies. He would build upon these gains in the remaining debates, while Douglas’s position would remain constant. The essay illustrates how critics can examine the rhetorical dynamics of a political debate. This essay was originally presented at the Knox College celebration of the centennial of the Galesburg debate in October, 2008. It is reprinted from Argumentation and Advocacy, 46 (Summer 2010), 140–149.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationArgumentation Library
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages211-223
Number of pages13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Publication series

NameArgumentation Library
Volume24
ISSN (Print)1566-7650
ISSN (Electronic)2215-1907

Keywords

  • Conspiracy argument
  • Galesburg
  • Lincoln
  • Lincoln-Douglas debates
  • Slavery—moral arguments
  • U.S. politics—1850s

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Turning Points in the Galesburg Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this