Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright

Thomas D. Cook

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031

Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright

Thomas D. Cook

Sociology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	37-40
Number of pages	4
Journal	Social Science and Medicine
Volume	210
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031
State	Published - Aug 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health(social science)
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031

Cite this

@article{6dce14c9fa964951afc90701a03a6372,

title = "Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright",

author = "Cook, {Thomas D.}",

year = "2018",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "210",

pages = "37--40",

journal = "Ethics in Science and Medicine",

issn = "0277-9536",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status

T2 - A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright

AU - Cook, Thomas D.

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047083720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047083720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.031

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29778288

AN - SCOPUS:85047083720

VL - 210

SP - 37

EP - 40

JO - Ethics in Science and Medicine

JF - Ethics in Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -

Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this