Two motivations for two dimensions of mind

Adam Waytz*, Liane Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective social interaction requires people to consider the minds of others. The present research suggests that different motivations systematically elicit attention to different components of mind. Four experiments manipulate either motivation for action prediction (effectance motivation) or motivation for affiliation and ask participants to evaluate the minds of outgroups. Experiments 1-2 feature hypothetical outgroups, while Experiment 3 targets Americans' relationship with China and also demonstrates consequences for moral judgment. Experiment 4 targets Americans' relationship with Iran and demonstrates consequences for moral and dispositional attribution toward groups. The findings reveal that effectance motivation relative to affiliation motivation triggers preferential focus toward agency (i.e., capacities for planning, thinking, intending), relative to experience (i.e., capacities for emotion and feeling). These results show that group mind judgments are determined not just by the features of the group but also by the motivations of the perceiver.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-283
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Motivation
experiment
outgroup
Emotions
moral judgement
Group
Interpersonal Relations
Iran
attribution
China
emotion
planning
interaction
Research
experience

Keywords

  • Affiliation
  • Effectance motivation
  • Group mind
  • Intergroup conflict
  • Theory of mind

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{9511d296b6e54eed81c6373e5906bc4e,
title = "Two motivations for two dimensions of mind",
abstract = "Effective social interaction requires people to consider the minds of others. The present research suggests that different motivations systematically elicit attention to different components of mind. Four experiments manipulate either motivation for action prediction (effectance motivation) or motivation for affiliation and ask participants to evaluate the minds of outgroups. Experiments 1-2 feature hypothetical outgroups, while Experiment 3 targets Americans' relationship with China and also demonstrates consequences for moral judgment. Experiment 4 targets Americans' relationship with Iran and demonstrates consequences for moral and dispositional attribution toward groups. The findings reveal that effectance motivation relative to affiliation motivation triggers preferential focus toward agency (i.e., capacities for planning, thinking, intending), relative to experience (i.e., capacities for emotion and feeling). These results show that group mind judgments are determined not just by the features of the group but also by the motivations of the perceiver.",
keywords = "Affiliation, Effectance motivation, Group mind, Intergroup conflict, Theory of mind",
author = "Adam Waytz and Liane Young",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "278--283",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Two motivations for two dimensions of mind. / Waytz, Adam; Young, Liane.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 55, 01.01.2014, p. 278-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two motivations for two dimensions of mind

AU - Waytz, Adam

AU - Young, Liane

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Effective social interaction requires people to consider the minds of others. The present research suggests that different motivations systematically elicit attention to different components of mind. Four experiments manipulate either motivation for action prediction (effectance motivation) or motivation for affiliation and ask participants to evaluate the minds of outgroups. Experiments 1-2 feature hypothetical outgroups, while Experiment 3 targets Americans' relationship with China and also demonstrates consequences for moral judgment. Experiment 4 targets Americans' relationship with Iran and demonstrates consequences for moral and dispositional attribution toward groups. The findings reveal that effectance motivation relative to affiliation motivation triggers preferential focus toward agency (i.e., capacities for planning, thinking, intending), relative to experience (i.e., capacities for emotion and feeling). These results show that group mind judgments are determined not just by the features of the group but also by the motivations of the perceiver.

AB - Effective social interaction requires people to consider the minds of others. The present research suggests that different motivations systematically elicit attention to different components of mind. Four experiments manipulate either motivation for action prediction (effectance motivation) or motivation for affiliation and ask participants to evaluate the minds of outgroups. Experiments 1-2 feature hypothetical outgroups, while Experiment 3 targets Americans' relationship with China and also demonstrates consequences for moral judgment. Experiment 4 targets Americans' relationship with Iran and demonstrates consequences for moral and dispositional attribution toward groups. The findings reveal that effectance motivation relative to affiliation motivation triggers preferential focus toward agency (i.e., capacities for planning, thinking, intending), relative to experience (i.e., capacities for emotion and feeling). These results show that group mind judgments are determined not just by the features of the group but also by the motivations of the perceiver.

KW - Affiliation

KW - Effectance motivation

KW - Group mind

KW - Intergroup conflict

KW - Theory of mind

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907043963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907043963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 278

EP - 283

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -