TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-stage treatment of ischial pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients
T2 - Technique and outcomes over 8 years
AU - Jordan, Sumanas Wanant
AU - De la Garza, Mauricio
AU - Lewis, Victor L.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Background Despite newly introduced techniques, reconstruction of ischial pressure ulcers remains a difficult problem with high-reported failure rates. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all spinal cord injury patients who underwent ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction by the senior author (V.L.) between 2004 and 2012. The two-stage procedure consisted of debridement and bone biopsy, followed by bursectomy, partial ischiectomy, fascial release, and gluteus maximus and hamstring advancement flaps. Postoperative care included 2-week supine bed rest on an air-fluidized bed, sitting tolerance rehabilitation, and thorough behavioral training. Results Sixty-five patients (74 flaps) were identified. A 45.9% had a previous attempt at reconstruction. The median follow-up period was 622 days. Overall, 67.6% of flaps were intact at the last follow-up. Superficial and deep dehiscence rates were 16.2 and 28.4%, respectively. Seven out of 35 flaps suffered late recurrence after being well healed for more than 1 year. History of previous reconstruction was found to be associated with increased odds of superficial (OR 6.02, 95% CI 1.55–23.3) and deep dehiscence (OR 12.3, 95% CI 1.99–76.9). Conclusions The evolution of the senior author's decades of practice has led to the development of a simpler repair, which relies on plane-by-plane release of scarred tissues to improve the mobility of muscle and skin flaps without large tissue movements, even in the setting of apparent extensive tissue loss. This technique is a reliable option, particularly for the primary ischial pressure ulcer.
AB - Background Despite newly introduced techniques, reconstruction of ischial pressure ulcers remains a difficult problem with high-reported failure rates. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all spinal cord injury patients who underwent ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction by the senior author (V.L.) between 2004 and 2012. The two-stage procedure consisted of debridement and bone biopsy, followed by bursectomy, partial ischiectomy, fascial release, and gluteus maximus and hamstring advancement flaps. Postoperative care included 2-week supine bed rest on an air-fluidized bed, sitting tolerance rehabilitation, and thorough behavioral training. Results Sixty-five patients (74 flaps) were identified. A 45.9% had a previous attempt at reconstruction. The median follow-up period was 622 days. Overall, 67.6% of flaps were intact at the last follow-up. Superficial and deep dehiscence rates were 16.2 and 28.4%, respectively. Seven out of 35 flaps suffered late recurrence after being well healed for more than 1 year. History of previous reconstruction was found to be associated with increased odds of superficial (OR 6.02, 95% CI 1.55–23.3) and deep dehiscence (OR 12.3, 95% CI 1.99–76.9). Conclusions The evolution of the senior author's decades of practice has led to the development of a simpler repair, which relies on plane-by-plane release of scarred tissues to improve the mobility of muscle and skin flaps without large tissue movements, even in the setting of apparent extensive tissue loss. This technique is a reliable option, particularly for the primary ischial pressure ulcer.
KW - Ischial pressure ulcer
KW - Muscle flap
KW - Osteomyelitis
KW - Spinal cord injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015693591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015693591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.01.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 28285012
AN - SCOPUS:85015693591
SN - 1748-6815
VL - 70
SP - 959
EP - 966
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
IS - 7
ER -