TY - GEN
T1 - Unbiased metamodeling via likelihood ratios
AU - Dong, Jing
AU - Ben Feng, M.
AU - Nelson, Barry L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of the United States under Grant Number CMMI-1634982.
PY - 2019/1/31
Y1 - 2019/1/31
N2 - Metamodeling has been a topic of longstanding interest in stochastic simulation because of the usefulness of metamodels for optimization, sensitivity, and real- or near-real-time decision making. Experiment design is the foundation of classical metamodeling: an effective experiment design uncovers the spatial relationships among the design/decision variables and the simulation response; therefore, more design points, providing better coverage of space, is almost always better. However, metamodeling based on likelihood ratios (LRs) turns the design question on its head: each design point provides an unbiased prediction of the response at any other location in space, but perhaps with such inflated variance as to be counterproductive. Thus, the question becomes more which design points to employ for prediction and less where to place them. In this paper we take the first comprehensive look at LR metamodeling, categorizing both the various types of LR metamodels and the contexts in which they might be employed.
AB - Metamodeling has been a topic of longstanding interest in stochastic simulation because of the usefulness of metamodels for optimization, sensitivity, and real- or near-real-time decision making. Experiment design is the foundation of classical metamodeling: an effective experiment design uncovers the spatial relationships among the design/decision variables and the simulation response; therefore, more design points, providing better coverage of space, is almost always better. However, metamodeling based on likelihood ratios (LRs) turns the design question on its head: each design point provides an unbiased prediction of the response at any other location in space, but perhaps with such inflated variance as to be counterproductive. Thus, the question becomes more which design points to employ for prediction and less where to place them. In this paper we take the first comprehensive look at LR metamodeling, categorizing both the various types of LR metamodels and the contexts in which they might be employed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062616644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062616644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/WSC.2018.8632506
DO - 10.1109/WSC.2018.8632506
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85062616644
T3 - Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference
SP - 1778
EP - 1789
BT - WSC 2018 - 2018 Winter Simulation Conference
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2018
Y2 - 9 December 2018 through 12 December 2018
ER -