TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Chemical Bonding in Alloys and the Representation in Atomistic Simulations
AU - Liu, Juan
AU - Tennessen, Emrys
AU - Miao, Jianwei
AU - Huang, Yu
AU - Rondinelli, James M.
AU - Heinz, Hendrik
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR-MURI-N00014-14-1-0675 and N00014-16-1-2280), the National Science Foundation (DMREF 1623947 and CBET 1530790), and the University of Colorado at Boulder. The allocation of computational resources at the CU Biofrontiers Computing Cluster and at the Ohio Supercomputing Center is acknowledged. This work further used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357, and the Janus supercomputer, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (award number CNS-0821794).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2018/7/5
Y1 - 2018/7/5
N2 - Alloys are widely used in catalysts and structural materials. The nature of chemical bonding and the origin of alloy formation energies, defect energies, and interfacial properties have not been well understood to date but are critical to material performance. In this contribution, we explain the polar nature of chemical bonding and an implementation in classical and reactive atomistic simulations to understand such properties more quantitatively. Electronegativity differences between metal atoms lead to polar bonding, and exothermic alloy formation energies are related to charge transfer between the different elements. These differences can be quantified by atomic charges using pairwise charge increments, determined by matching the computed alloy formation energy to experimentally measured alloy formation energies using pair potentials for the pure metals. The polar character of alloys is comparable to organic molecules and partially ionic minerals, for example, AlNi and AlNi3 alloys assume significant atomic charges of ±0.40e and +0.60e/-0.20e, respectively. The subsequent analysis of defect sites and defect energies using force-field-based calculations shows excellent agreement with calculations using density functional theory and embedded atom models (EAM). The formation of vacancy and antisite defects is characterized by a redistribution of charge in the first shell of neighbor atoms in the classical models whereby electroneutrality is maintained and charge increments correlate with differences in electronegativity. The proposed atomic charges represent internal dipole and multipole moments, consistent with existing definitions for organic and inorganic compounds and with the extended Born model (Heinz, H.; Suter, U. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (47), 18341-18352). The method can be applied to any alloy and has a reproducibility of ±10%. In contrast, quantum mechanical charge schemes remain associated with deviations exceeding ±100%. The atomic charges for alloys provide a simple initial measure for the internal electronic structure, surface adsorption of molecules, and reactivity in catalysis and corrosion. The models are compatible with the Interface force field (IFF), CHARMM, AMBER, OPLS-AA, PCFF, CVFF, and GROMOS for reliable atomistic simulations of alloys and their interfaces with minerals and electrolytes from the nanometer scale to the micrometer scale.
AB - Alloys are widely used in catalysts and structural materials. The nature of chemical bonding and the origin of alloy formation energies, defect energies, and interfacial properties have not been well understood to date but are critical to material performance. In this contribution, we explain the polar nature of chemical bonding and an implementation in classical and reactive atomistic simulations to understand such properties more quantitatively. Electronegativity differences between metal atoms lead to polar bonding, and exothermic alloy formation energies are related to charge transfer between the different elements. These differences can be quantified by atomic charges using pairwise charge increments, determined by matching the computed alloy formation energy to experimentally measured alloy formation energies using pair potentials for the pure metals. The polar character of alloys is comparable to organic molecules and partially ionic minerals, for example, AlNi and AlNi3 alloys assume significant atomic charges of ±0.40e and +0.60e/-0.20e, respectively. The subsequent analysis of defect sites and defect energies using force-field-based calculations shows excellent agreement with calculations using density functional theory and embedded atom models (EAM). The formation of vacancy and antisite defects is characterized by a redistribution of charge in the first shell of neighbor atoms in the classical models whereby electroneutrality is maintained and charge increments correlate with differences in electronegativity. The proposed atomic charges represent internal dipole and multipole moments, consistent with existing definitions for organic and inorganic compounds and with the extended Born model (Heinz, H.; Suter, U. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (47), 18341-18352). The method can be applied to any alloy and has a reproducibility of ±10%. In contrast, quantum mechanical charge schemes remain associated with deviations exceeding ±100%. The atomic charges for alloys provide a simple initial measure for the internal electronic structure, surface adsorption of molecules, and reactivity in catalysis and corrosion. The models are compatible with the Interface force field (IFF), CHARMM, AMBER, OPLS-AA, PCFF, CVFF, and GROMOS for reliable atomistic simulations of alloys and their interfaces with minerals and electrolytes from the nanometer scale to the micrometer scale.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048059778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048059778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01891
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01891
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048059778
VL - 122
SP - 14996
EP - 15009
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
SN - 1932-7447
IS - 26
ER -