TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Factors Influencing Quality Improvement Capacity among Ambulatory Care Practices across the MidSouth Region
T2 - An Exploratory Qualitative Study
AU - Varley, Allyson L.
AU - Kripalani, Sunil
AU - Spain, Thomas
AU - Mixon, Amanda S.
AU - Acord, Erin
AU - Rothman, Russell
AU - Limper, Heather M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence: Allyson L. Varley, PhD, MPH, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 700 19th St S, Research and Development RM 4713, Birmingham, AL 35233 (avarley@uab.edu or Allyson.varley@va.gov). These efforts were supported by grant 1L1CMS333461-01-00 from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dr Varley’s effort was supported by grant T32HS013852 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Q Manage Health Care Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 136–141
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Background and Objective: Success in choosing and implementing quality metrics, necessary in a value-based care model, depends on quality improvement (QI) capacity - the shared knowledge, understanding, and commitment to continuous improvement. We set out to explore factors influencing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices in the MidSouth Practice Transformation Network. Methods: As part of network participation, 82 practices submitted a plan for implementing self-selected quality metrics. This plan asked practices to identify factors that would assist or impede successful implementation of interventions to meet metric targets. We used a qualitative thematic analysis approach to explore barriers and facilitators to developing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices. Results: Recurrent facilitators included external change agents, protected time for QI, a framework for improvement, and infrastructure including electronic health record (EHR) capabilities. Frequent barriers included lack of QI knowledge, lack of time, frequent staff turnover, inadequate EHR capabilities, lack of an internal change agent, and a belief that performance was outside of the practice's control. Conclusion: These findings provide insight into factors influencing the adoption and implementation of QI metrics across a diverse group of ambulatory care practices and suggest that targeting the Inner Setting of practices may be an appropriate approach for developing practice-level QI capacity, which is necessary for success in a value-based care model.
AB - Background and Objective: Success in choosing and implementing quality metrics, necessary in a value-based care model, depends on quality improvement (QI) capacity - the shared knowledge, understanding, and commitment to continuous improvement. We set out to explore factors influencing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices in the MidSouth Practice Transformation Network. Methods: As part of network participation, 82 practices submitted a plan for implementing self-selected quality metrics. This plan asked practices to identify factors that would assist or impede successful implementation of interventions to meet metric targets. We used a qualitative thematic analysis approach to explore barriers and facilitators to developing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices. Results: Recurrent facilitators included external change agents, protected time for QI, a framework for improvement, and infrastructure including electronic health record (EHR) capabilities. Frequent barriers included lack of QI knowledge, lack of time, frequent staff turnover, inadequate EHR capabilities, lack of an internal change agent, and a belief that performance was outside of the practice's control. Conclusion: These findings provide insight into factors influencing the adoption and implementation of QI metrics across a diverse group of ambulatory care practices and suggest that targeting the Inner Setting of practices may be an appropriate approach for developing practice-level QI capacity, which is necessary for success in a value-based care model.
KW - implementation
KW - qualitative
KW - quality improvement capacity
KW - quality metrics
KW - value-based care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087321310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087321310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000255
DO - 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000255
M3 - Article
C2 - 32590488
AN - SCOPUS:85087321310
SN - 1063-8628
VL - 29
SP - 136
EP - 141
JO - Quality Management in Health Care
JF - Quality Management in Health Care
IS - 3
ER -