TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding self-monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management
T2 - A proof-of-concept randomized trial
AU - Liu, Jianyi
AU - Munson, Sean A.
AU - Chang, Angela
AU - Voss, Claire
AU - Graham, Andrea K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objective: This study explored consumers' perspectives on self-monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self-selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self-monitoring than monitoring only default options. Methods: In a proof-of-concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to “clinician-determined monitoring” or “clinician + self-determined monitoring” conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the “clinician-determined” condition monitored their weight and binge-eating episodes, and participants in the “clinician + self-determined” condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed. Results: Participants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the “clinician + self-determined” condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the “clinician-determined” condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. Discussion: Although our proof-of-concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. Public Significance: Examining consumers' self-monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof-of-concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery.
AB - Objective: This study explored consumers' perspectives on self-monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self-selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self-monitoring than monitoring only default options. Methods: In a proof-of-concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to “clinician-determined monitoring” or “clinician + self-determined monitoring” conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the “clinician-determined” condition monitored their weight and binge-eating episodes, and participants in the “clinician + self-determined” condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed. Results: Participants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the “clinician + self-determined” condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the “clinician-determined” condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. Discussion: Although our proof-of-concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. Public Significance: Examining consumers' self-monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof-of-concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery.
KW - binge eating
KW - mobile intervention
KW - self-monitoring
KW - user-centered design
KW - weight management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126038227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126038227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eat.23700
DO - 10.1002/eat.23700
M3 - Article
C2 - 35277986
AN - SCOPUS:85126038227
SN - 0276-3478
VL - 55
SP - 642
EP - 652
JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 5
ER -