TY - JOUR
T1 - “Unfortunately, I don't have an answer for you”
T2 - How resident physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty to patients during emergency department discharge
AU - Doty, Amanda MB
AU - Rising, Kristin L.
AU - Hsiao, Ting Ann
AU - Amadio, Grace
AU - Gentsch, Alexzandra T.
AU - Salcedo, Venise J.
AU - McElwee, Ian
AU - Cameron, Kenzie A.
AU - Salzman, David H.
AU - Papanagnou, Dimitrios
AU - McCarthy, Danielle M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: To describe how emergency medicine resident physicians discuss diagnostic uncertainty during a simulated ED discharge discussion. Methods: A secondary content analysis of simulated clinical encounter audiotapes completed by emergency medicine residents across two sites. Results: When discussing lack of diagnosis, residents explained the evaluation revealed no cause for symptoms, noted concerning diagnoses that were excluded, and acknowledged both symptoms and patients’ feelings. Residents used explicit and implicit language to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with similar frequency. Almost half of the residents discussed the ED role as focused on emergent illness to give patients context for their uncertain diagnoses. However, 28% of residents in this study did not discuss diagnostic uncertainty in any form. All residents provided reassurance. Conclusion: Residents use a range of approaches to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with patients at the time of a simulated ED discharge, with some residents omitting discussion of uncertainty entirely. Practice implications: These findings represent the current state of communication, which needs improvement. These findings do not immediately transfer to clinical practice recommendations, but rather support a need for both further study and development of formal communication training on this topic.
AB - Objective: To describe how emergency medicine resident physicians discuss diagnostic uncertainty during a simulated ED discharge discussion. Methods: A secondary content analysis of simulated clinical encounter audiotapes completed by emergency medicine residents across two sites. Results: When discussing lack of diagnosis, residents explained the evaluation revealed no cause for symptoms, noted concerning diagnoses that were excluded, and acknowledged both symptoms and patients’ feelings. Residents used explicit and implicit language to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with similar frequency. Almost half of the residents discussed the ED role as focused on emergent illness to give patients context for their uncertain diagnoses. However, 28% of residents in this study did not discuss diagnostic uncertainty in any form. All residents provided reassurance. Conclusion: Residents use a range of approaches to discuss diagnostic uncertainty with patients at the time of a simulated ED discharge, with some residents omitting discussion of uncertainty entirely. Practice implications: These findings represent the current state of communication, which needs improvement. These findings do not immediately transfer to clinical practice recommendations, but rather support a need for both further study and development of formal communication training on this topic.
KW - Diagnostic uncertainty
KW - Emergency medicine
KW - Provider communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124551790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124551790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35168855
AN - SCOPUS:85124551790
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 105
SP - 2053
EP - 2057
JO - Patient education and counseling
JF - Patient education and counseling
IS - 7
ER -