Unpacking resident-led code status discussions

Results from a mixed methods study

Rashmi K. Sharma*, Nelia Jain, Namrata Peswani, Eytan Szmuilowicz, Diane B. Wayne, Kenzie A. Cameron

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quality of code status discussions (CSDs) is suboptimal as physicians often fail to discuss patients' goals of care and resuscitation outcomes. We previously demonstrated that internal medicine residents randomized to a communication skills intervention scored higher than controls on a CSD checklist using a standardized patient. However, the impact of this training on CSD content is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare CSD content between intervention and control residents. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative analysis of simulated CSDs. Augmenting a priori codes with constant comparative analysis, we identified key themes associated with resident determination of code status. We dichotomized each theme as present or absent. We used chi-square tests to evaluate the association between training and presence of each theme. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six residents rotating on the internal medicine service in July 2010 were randomized to intervention (n=25) or control (n=31). INTERVENTION: Intervention residents completed CSD skills training (lectures, deliberate practice, and self-study). Six months later, all 56 residents completed a simulated CSD. MAIN MEASURE: Comparison of key themes identified in CSDs among intervention and controls. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-one transcripts were recorded and reviewed. Themes identified included: exploration of patient values/goals, framing code status as a patient decision, discussion of resuscitation outcomes and quality of life, and making a recommendation regarding code status. Intervention residents were more likely than controls to explore patient values/goals (p=0.002) and make a recommendation (p<0.001); and less likely to frame the decision as one solely to be made by the patient (p=0.01). Less than one-third of residents discussed resuscitation outcomes or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Training positively influenced CSD content in key domains, including exploration of patient values/goals, making a recommendation regarding code status, and not framing code status as solely a patient decision. However, despite the intervention, residents infrequently discussed resuscitation outcomes and quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)750-757
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Quality of Life
Internal Medicine
Resuscitation Orders
Patient Care Planning
Chi-Square Distribution
Checklist
Patient Care
Communication
Physicians

Keywords

  • code status
  • medical education
  • palliative care
  • physician-patient communication
  • resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

@article{736889324433421b93b5036dbc865ec7,
title = "Unpacking resident-led code status discussions: Results from a mixed methods study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The quality of code status discussions (CSDs) is suboptimal as physicians often fail to discuss patients' goals of care and resuscitation outcomes. We previously demonstrated that internal medicine residents randomized to a communication skills intervention scored higher than controls on a CSD checklist using a standardized patient. However, the impact of this training on CSD content is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare CSD content between intervention and control residents. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative analysis of simulated CSDs. Augmenting a priori codes with constant comparative analysis, we identified key themes associated with resident determination of code status. We dichotomized each theme as present or absent. We used chi-square tests to evaluate the association between training and presence of each theme. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six residents rotating on the internal medicine service in July 2010 were randomized to intervention (n=25) or control (n=31). INTERVENTION: Intervention residents completed CSD skills training (lectures, deliberate practice, and self-study). Six months later, all 56 residents completed a simulated CSD. MAIN MEASURE: Comparison of key themes identified in CSDs among intervention and controls. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-one transcripts were recorded and reviewed. Themes identified included: exploration of patient values/goals, framing code status as a patient decision, discussion of resuscitation outcomes and quality of life, and making a recommendation regarding code status. Intervention residents were more likely than controls to explore patient values/goals (p=0.002) and make a recommendation (p<0.001); and less likely to frame the decision as one solely to be made by the patient (p=0.01). Less than one-third of residents discussed resuscitation outcomes or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Training positively influenced CSD content in key domains, including exploration of patient values/goals, making a recommendation regarding code status, and not framing code status as solely a patient decision. However, despite the intervention, residents infrequently discussed resuscitation outcomes and quality of life.",
keywords = "code status, medical education, palliative care, physician-patient communication, resuscitation",
author = "Sharma, {Rashmi K.} and Nelia Jain and Namrata Peswani and Eytan Szmuilowicz and Wayne, {Diane B.} and Cameron, {Kenzie A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-014-2791-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "750--757",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

Unpacking resident-led code status discussions : Results from a mixed methods study. / Sharma, Rashmi K.; Jain, Nelia; Peswani, Namrata; Szmuilowicz, Eytan; Wayne, Diane B.; Cameron, Kenzie A.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 750-757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking resident-led code status discussions

T2 - Results from a mixed methods study

AU - Sharma, Rashmi K.

AU - Jain, Nelia

AU - Peswani, Namrata

AU - Szmuilowicz, Eytan

AU - Wayne, Diane B.

AU - Cameron, Kenzie A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The quality of code status discussions (CSDs) is suboptimal as physicians often fail to discuss patients' goals of care and resuscitation outcomes. We previously demonstrated that internal medicine residents randomized to a communication skills intervention scored higher than controls on a CSD checklist using a standardized patient. However, the impact of this training on CSD content is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare CSD content between intervention and control residents. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative analysis of simulated CSDs. Augmenting a priori codes with constant comparative analysis, we identified key themes associated with resident determination of code status. We dichotomized each theme as present or absent. We used chi-square tests to evaluate the association between training and presence of each theme. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six residents rotating on the internal medicine service in July 2010 were randomized to intervention (n=25) or control (n=31). INTERVENTION: Intervention residents completed CSD skills training (lectures, deliberate practice, and self-study). Six months later, all 56 residents completed a simulated CSD. MAIN MEASURE: Comparison of key themes identified in CSDs among intervention and controls. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-one transcripts were recorded and reviewed. Themes identified included: exploration of patient values/goals, framing code status as a patient decision, discussion of resuscitation outcomes and quality of life, and making a recommendation regarding code status. Intervention residents were more likely than controls to explore patient values/goals (p=0.002) and make a recommendation (p<0.001); and less likely to frame the decision as one solely to be made by the patient (p=0.01). Less than one-third of residents discussed resuscitation outcomes or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Training positively influenced CSD content in key domains, including exploration of patient values/goals, making a recommendation regarding code status, and not framing code status as solely a patient decision. However, despite the intervention, residents infrequently discussed resuscitation outcomes and quality of life.

AB - BACKGROUND: The quality of code status discussions (CSDs) is suboptimal as physicians often fail to discuss patients' goals of care and resuscitation outcomes. We previously demonstrated that internal medicine residents randomized to a communication skills intervention scored higher than controls on a CSD checklist using a standardized patient. However, the impact of this training on CSD content is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare CSD content between intervention and control residents. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative analysis of simulated CSDs. Augmenting a priori codes with constant comparative analysis, we identified key themes associated with resident determination of code status. We dichotomized each theme as present or absent. We used chi-square tests to evaluate the association between training and presence of each theme. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six residents rotating on the internal medicine service in July 2010 were randomized to intervention (n=25) or control (n=31). INTERVENTION: Intervention residents completed CSD skills training (lectures, deliberate practice, and self-study). Six months later, all 56 residents completed a simulated CSD. MAIN MEASURE: Comparison of key themes identified in CSDs among intervention and controls. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-one transcripts were recorded and reviewed. Themes identified included: exploration of patient values/goals, framing code status as a patient decision, discussion of resuscitation outcomes and quality of life, and making a recommendation regarding code status. Intervention residents were more likely than controls to explore patient values/goals (p=0.002) and make a recommendation (p<0.001); and less likely to frame the decision as one solely to be made by the patient (p=0.01). Less than one-third of residents discussed resuscitation outcomes or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Training positively influenced CSD content in key domains, including exploration of patient values/goals, making a recommendation regarding code status, and not framing code status as solely a patient decision. However, despite the intervention, residents infrequently discussed resuscitation outcomes and quality of life.

KW - code status

KW - medical education

KW - palliative care

KW - physician-patient communication

KW - resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900845646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900845646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-014-2791-3

DO - 10.1007/s11606-014-2791-3

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 750

EP - 757

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 5

ER -