Use of consensus methodology to determine candidate items for systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria

Sindhu R. Johnson*, Dinesh Khanna, David Daikh, Ricard Cervera, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Dafna D. Gladman, Bevra H. Hahn, Falk Hiepe, Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero, Elena Massarotti, Dimitrios T. Boumpas, Karen H. Costenbader, David Jayne, Thomas Dörner, Diane L. Kamen, Marta Mosca, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Josef S. Smolen, David Wofsy, Martin Aringer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), high-performing classification criteria are critical to advancing research and clinical care. A collaborative effort by the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology was undertaken to generate candidate criteria, and then to reduce them to a smaller set. The objective of the current study was to select a set of criteria that maximizes the likelihood of accurate classification of SLE, particularly early disease. Methods. An independent panel of international SLE experts and the SLE classification criteria steering committee (conducting SLE research in Canada, Mexico, United States, Austria, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, and Spain) ranked 43 candidate criteria. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique (NGT) was conducted to reduce the list of criteria for consideration. Results. The expert panel NGT exercise reduced the candidate criteria for SLE classification from 43 to 21. The panel distinguished potential "entry criteria," which would be required for classification, from potential "additive criteria." Potential entry criteria were antinuclear antibody (ANA) = 1:80 (HEp-2 immunofluorescence), and low C3 and/or low C4. The use of low complement as an entry criterion was considered potentially useful in cases with negative ANA. Potential additive criteria included lupus nephritis by renal biopsy, autoantibodies, cytopenias, acute and chronic cutaneous lupus, alopecia, arthritis, serositis, oral mucosal lesions, central nervous system manifestations, and fever. Conclusion. The NGT exercise resulted in 21 candidate SLE classification criteria. The next phases of SLE classification criteria development will require refinement of criteria definitions, evaluation of the ability to cluster criteria into domains, and evaluation of weighting of criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)721-726
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

  • CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
  • CONSENSUS METHODS
  • NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
  • SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Use of consensus methodology to determine candidate items for systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Johnson, S. R., Khanna, D., Daikh, D., Cervera, R., Costedoat-Chalumeau, N., Gladman, D. D., Hahn, B. H., Hiepe, F., Sánchez-Guerrero, J., Massarotti, E., Boumpas, D. T., Costenbader, K. H., Jayne, D., Dörner, T., Kamen, D. L., Mosca, M., Ramsey-Goldman, R., Smolen, J. S., Wofsy, D., & Aringer, M. (2019). Use of consensus methodology to determine candidate items for systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria. Journal of Rheumatology, 46(7), 721-726. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180478