TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by American urologists
T2 - Internet and postal survey
AU - Kim, Hyung L.
AU - Hollowell, Courtney M P
AU - Patel, Rajesh V.
AU - Bales, Gregory T.
AU - Clayman, Ralph V.
AU - Gerber, Glenn S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from Boston Scientific Corporation.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Objectives. To assess the use of new technology by American urologists.Methods. Using the American Urological Association directory, surveys were sent via the U.S. postal service to 1000 randomly selected American urologists and 3065 urologists who had an Internet address listed in the directory.Results. Responses were received from 601 urologists (415 postal, 186 Internet). Overall, 81% of survey respondents reported performing fewer or the same number of percutaneous procedures as compared with 3 to 4 years ago and 84% reported carrying out more or the same number of ureteroscopic procedures in the treatment of patients with stone disease. Open dismembered pyeloplasty (43%) and Acucise endopyelotomy (42%) were most frequently reported as the preferred treatment for adult patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Although 60% of respondents reported that they have taken a laparoscopy course, 67% currently do not perform any laparoscopy in their practice. In addition, only 7% of urologists stated that laparoscopy comprises more than 5% of their practice. When stratified by the number of years in practice, those in practice less than 10 years were more likely than those in practice 10 to 20 years and those in practice longer than 20 years to have performed an endopyelotomy (77%, 60%, and 48%, respectively, P <0.001) and to be currently performing laparoscopy (49%, 36%, and 18%, respectively, P <0.001).Conclusions. Compared with 3 to 4 years ago, American urologists are performing more ureteroscopy and fewer percutaneous stone procedures. Although most urologists have taken laparoscopy courses, this modality has not been widely incorporated into their practices at present. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
AB - Objectives. To assess the use of new technology by American urologists.Methods. Using the American Urological Association directory, surveys were sent via the U.S. postal service to 1000 randomly selected American urologists and 3065 urologists who had an Internet address listed in the directory.Results. Responses were received from 601 urologists (415 postal, 186 Internet). Overall, 81% of survey respondents reported performing fewer or the same number of percutaneous procedures as compared with 3 to 4 years ago and 84% reported carrying out more or the same number of ureteroscopic procedures in the treatment of patients with stone disease. Open dismembered pyeloplasty (43%) and Acucise endopyelotomy (42%) were most frequently reported as the preferred treatment for adult patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Although 60% of respondents reported that they have taken a laparoscopy course, 67% currently do not perform any laparoscopy in their practice. In addition, only 7% of urologists stated that laparoscopy comprises more than 5% of their practice. When stratified by the number of years in practice, those in practice less than 10 years were more likely than those in practice 10 to 20 years and those in practice longer than 20 years to have performed an endopyelotomy (77%, 60%, and 48%, respectively, P <0.001) and to be currently performing laparoscopy (49%, 36%, and 18%, respectively, P <0.001).Conclusions. Compared with 3 to 4 years ago, American urologists are performing more ureteroscopy and fewer percutaneous stone procedures. Although most urologists have taken laparoscopy courses, this modality has not been widely incorporated into their practices at present. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033790455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033790455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00731-7
DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00731-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 11068295
AN - SCOPUS:0033790455
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 56
SP - 760
EP - 765
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 5
ER -