Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population

Sherri L. LaVela*, Bella Etingen, Scott Miskevics, David Cella

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: PROMIS® items have not been widely or systematically used within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Objective: To examine the concordance of PROMIS-29® scores and medical record diagnosis in US Veterans and to compare Veteran scores relative to US population norms. Design/Participants: Cross-sectional multi-site survey of Veterans (n = 3221) provided sociodemographic and PROMIS-29® domain data. Electronic medical records provided health condition (depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, pain disorders) diagnosis data. Main Measures: For each domain, we calculated PROMIS® standardized T scores and used t tests to compare PROMIS® scores for Veterans diagnosed with each targeted health condition vs. those without that documented clinical diagnosis and compare mean Veterans’ PROMIS-29® with US adult population norms. Key Results: Veterans with (vs. without) a depression diagnosis reported significantly higher PROMIS® depression scores (60.3 vs. 49.6, p <.0001); those with an anxiety diagnosis (vs. without) reported higher average PROMIS® anxiety scores (62.7 vs. 50.9, p <.0001). Veterans with (vs. without) a pain disorder reported higher pain interference (65.3 vs. 57.7, p <.0001) and pain intensity (6.4 vs. 4.4, p <.0001). Veterans with (vs. without) a sleep disorder reported higher sleep disturbance (55.8 vs. 51.2, p <.0001) and fatigue (57.5 vs. 51.8, p <.0001) PROMIS® scores. Compared with the general population norms, Veterans scored worse across all PROMIS-29® domains. Conclusions: We found that PROMIS-29® domains are selectively sensitive to expected differences between clinically-defined groups, suggesting their appropriateness as indicators of condition symptomology among Veterans. Notably, Veterans scored worse across all PROMIS-29(R) domains compared with population norms. Taken collectively, our findings suggest that PROMIS-29® may be a useful tool for VA providers to assess patient’s physical and mental health, and because PROMIS® items are normed to the general population, this offers a way to compare the health of Veterans with the adult population at large and identify disparate areas for intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1452-1458
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2019

Keywords

  • PROMIS
  • Veterans
  • health-related quality of life
  • mental health
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • physical health
  • social role

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this