Using google glass in surgical settings: Systematic review

Nancy J. Wei, Bryn Dougherty, Aundria Myers, Sherif M. Badawy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In recent years, wearable devices have become increasingly attractive and the health care industry has been especially drawn to Google Glass because of its ability to serve as a head-mounted wearable device. The use of Google Glass in surgical settings is of particular interest due to the hands-free device potential to streamline workflow and maintain sterile conditions in an operating room environment. Objective: The aim is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the literature on the feasibility and acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings and to assess the potential benefits and limitations of its application. Methods: The literature was searched for articles published between January 2013 and May 2017. The search included the following databases: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and IEEE Xplore. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles. Original research articles that evaluated the feasibility, usability, or acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings were included. This review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Results of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of the 520 records obtained, 31 met all predefined criteria and were included in this review. Google Glass was used in various surgical specialties. Most studies were in the United States (23/31, 74%) and all were conducted in hospital settings: 29 in adult hospitals (29/31, 94%) and two in children’s hospitals (2/31, 7%). Sample sizes of participants who wore Google Glass ranged from 1 to 40. Of the 31 studies, 25 (81%) were conducted under real-time conditions or actual clinical care settings, whereas the other six (19%) were conducted under simulated environment. Twenty-six studies were pilot or feasibility studies (84%), three were case studies (10%), and two were randomized controlled trials (6%). The majority of studies examined the potential use of Google Glass as an intraoperative intervention (27/31, 87%), whereas others observed its potential use in preoperative (4/31, 13%) and postoperative settings (5/31, 16%). Google Glass was utilized as a videography and photography device (21/31, 68%), a vital sign monitor (6/31, 19%), a surgical navigation display (5/31, 16%), and as a videoconferencing tool to communicate with remote surgeons intraoperatively (5/31, 16%). Most studies reported moderate or high acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings. The main reported limitations of using Google Glass utilization were short battery life (8/31, 26%) and difficulty with hands-free features (5/31, 16%). Conclusions: There are promising feasibility and usability data of using Google Glass in surgical settings with particular benefits for surgical education and training. Despite existing technical limitations, Google Glass was generally well received and several studies in surgical settings acknowledged its potential for training, consultation, patient monitoring, and audiovisual recording.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere54
JournalJMIR mHealth and uHealth
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Glass
Equipment and Supplies
Hand
Surgical Specialties
Videoconferencing
Health Care Sector
Workflow
Vital Signs
Photography
Feasibility Studies
Physiologic Monitoring
Operating Rooms
PubMed
MEDLINE
Sample Size
Meta-Analysis
Nursing
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Head

Keywords

  • Google Glass
  • Head-mounted wearable device
  • Surgery
  • Surgical condition
  • Surgical setting
  • Wearable
  • Wearable device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Wei, Nancy J. ; Dougherty, Bryn ; Myers, Aundria ; Badawy, Sherif M. / Using google glass in surgical settings : Systematic review. In: JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 3.
@article{fc4a0e39fe4340e5a6f23c3ed04f221d,
title = "Using google glass in surgical settings: Systematic review",
abstract = "Background: In recent years, wearable devices have become increasingly attractive and the health care industry has been especially drawn to Google Glass because of its ability to serve as a head-mounted wearable device. The use of Google Glass in surgical settings is of particular interest due to the hands-free device potential to streamline workflow and maintain sterile conditions in an operating room environment. Objective: The aim is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the literature on the feasibility and acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings and to assess the potential benefits and limitations of its application. Methods: The literature was searched for articles published between January 2013 and May 2017. The search included the following databases: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and IEEE Xplore. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles. Original research articles that evaluated the feasibility, usability, or acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings were included. This review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Results of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of the 520 records obtained, 31 met all predefined criteria and were included in this review. Google Glass was used in various surgical specialties. Most studies were in the United States (23/31, 74{\%}) and all were conducted in hospital settings: 29 in adult hospitals (29/31, 94{\%}) and two in children’s hospitals (2/31, 7{\%}). Sample sizes of participants who wore Google Glass ranged from 1 to 40. Of the 31 studies, 25 (81{\%}) were conducted under real-time conditions or actual clinical care settings, whereas the other six (19{\%}) were conducted under simulated environment. Twenty-six studies were pilot or feasibility studies (84{\%}), three were case studies (10{\%}), and two were randomized controlled trials (6{\%}). The majority of studies examined the potential use of Google Glass as an intraoperative intervention (27/31, 87{\%}), whereas others observed its potential use in preoperative (4/31, 13{\%}) and postoperative settings (5/31, 16{\%}). Google Glass was utilized as a videography and photography device (21/31, 68{\%}), a vital sign monitor (6/31, 19{\%}), a surgical navigation display (5/31, 16{\%}), and as a videoconferencing tool to communicate with remote surgeons intraoperatively (5/31, 16{\%}). Most studies reported moderate or high acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings. The main reported limitations of using Google Glass utilization were short battery life (8/31, 26{\%}) and difficulty with hands-free features (5/31, 16{\%}). Conclusions: There are promising feasibility and usability data of using Google Glass in surgical settings with particular benefits for surgical education and training. Despite existing technical limitations, Google Glass was generally well received and several studies in surgical settings acknowledged its potential for training, consultation, patient monitoring, and audiovisual recording.",
keywords = "Google Glass, Head-mounted wearable device, Surgery, Surgical condition, Surgical setting, Wearable, Wearable device",
author = "Wei, {Nancy J.} and Bryn Dougherty and Aundria Myers and Badawy, {Sherif M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2196/mhealth.9409",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "JMIR mHealth and uHealth",
issn = "2291-5222",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "3",

}

Using google glass in surgical settings : Systematic review. / Wei, Nancy J.; Dougherty, Bryn; Myers, Aundria; Badawy, Sherif M.

In: JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 6, No. 3, e54, 03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using google glass in surgical settings

T2 - Systematic review

AU - Wei, Nancy J.

AU - Dougherty, Bryn

AU - Myers, Aundria

AU - Badawy, Sherif M.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Background: In recent years, wearable devices have become increasingly attractive and the health care industry has been especially drawn to Google Glass because of its ability to serve as a head-mounted wearable device. The use of Google Glass in surgical settings is of particular interest due to the hands-free device potential to streamline workflow and maintain sterile conditions in an operating room environment. Objective: The aim is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the literature on the feasibility and acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings and to assess the potential benefits and limitations of its application. Methods: The literature was searched for articles published between January 2013 and May 2017. The search included the following databases: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and IEEE Xplore. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles. Original research articles that evaluated the feasibility, usability, or acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings were included. This review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Results of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of the 520 records obtained, 31 met all predefined criteria and were included in this review. Google Glass was used in various surgical specialties. Most studies were in the United States (23/31, 74%) and all were conducted in hospital settings: 29 in adult hospitals (29/31, 94%) and two in children’s hospitals (2/31, 7%). Sample sizes of participants who wore Google Glass ranged from 1 to 40. Of the 31 studies, 25 (81%) were conducted under real-time conditions or actual clinical care settings, whereas the other six (19%) were conducted under simulated environment. Twenty-six studies were pilot or feasibility studies (84%), three were case studies (10%), and two were randomized controlled trials (6%). The majority of studies examined the potential use of Google Glass as an intraoperative intervention (27/31, 87%), whereas others observed its potential use in preoperative (4/31, 13%) and postoperative settings (5/31, 16%). Google Glass was utilized as a videography and photography device (21/31, 68%), a vital sign monitor (6/31, 19%), a surgical navigation display (5/31, 16%), and as a videoconferencing tool to communicate with remote surgeons intraoperatively (5/31, 16%). Most studies reported moderate or high acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings. The main reported limitations of using Google Glass utilization were short battery life (8/31, 26%) and difficulty with hands-free features (5/31, 16%). Conclusions: There are promising feasibility and usability data of using Google Glass in surgical settings with particular benefits for surgical education and training. Despite existing technical limitations, Google Glass was generally well received and several studies in surgical settings acknowledged its potential for training, consultation, patient monitoring, and audiovisual recording.

AB - Background: In recent years, wearable devices have become increasingly attractive and the health care industry has been especially drawn to Google Glass because of its ability to serve as a head-mounted wearable device. The use of Google Glass in surgical settings is of particular interest due to the hands-free device potential to streamline workflow and maintain sterile conditions in an operating room environment. Objective: The aim is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the literature on the feasibility and acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings and to assess the potential benefits and limitations of its application. Methods: The literature was searched for articles published between January 2013 and May 2017. The search included the following databases: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and IEEE Xplore. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles. Original research articles that evaluated the feasibility, usability, or acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings were included. This review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Results of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of the 520 records obtained, 31 met all predefined criteria and were included in this review. Google Glass was used in various surgical specialties. Most studies were in the United States (23/31, 74%) and all were conducted in hospital settings: 29 in adult hospitals (29/31, 94%) and two in children’s hospitals (2/31, 7%). Sample sizes of participants who wore Google Glass ranged from 1 to 40. Of the 31 studies, 25 (81%) were conducted under real-time conditions or actual clinical care settings, whereas the other six (19%) were conducted under simulated environment. Twenty-six studies were pilot or feasibility studies (84%), three were case studies (10%), and two were randomized controlled trials (6%). The majority of studies examined the potential use of Google Glass as an intraoperative intervention (27/31, 87%), whereas others observed its potential use in preoperative (4/31, 13%) and postoperative settings (5/31, 16%). Google Glass was utilized as a videography and photography device (21/31, 68%), a vital sign monitor (6/31, 19%), a surgical navigation display (5/31, 16%), and as a videoconferencing tool to communicate with remote surgeons intraoperatively (5/31, 16%). Most studies reported moderate or high acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings. The main reported limitations of using Google Glass utilization were short battery life (8/31, 26%) and difficulty with hands-free features (5/31, 16%). Conclusions: There are promising feasibility and usability data of using Google Glass in surgical settings with particular benefits for surgical education and training. Despite existing technical limitations, Google Glass was generally well received and several studies in surgical settings acknowledged its potential for training, consultation, patient monitoring, and audiovisual recording.

KW - Google Glass

KW - Head-mounted wearable device

KW - Surgery

KW - Surgical condition

KW - Surgical setting

KW - Wearable

KW - Wearable device

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060342035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060342035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/mhealth.9409

DO - 10.2196/mhealth.9409

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29510969

AN - SCOPUS:85060342035

VL - 6

JO - JMIR mHealth and uHealth

JF - JMIR mHealth and uHealth

SN - 2291-5222

IS - 3

M1 - e54

ER -