Using implementation science to guide the integration of evidence-based family interventions into primary care

Justin D. Smith*, Jodi Polaha

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is a demonstration of how an implementation-science (IS) framework can be coupled with the measurement of implementation outcomes to effectively integrate evidence-based family interventions in primary care. The primary care environment presents a number of challenges for successfully integrating such interventions. How-ever, IS methods can improve the prospect of successfully implementing a new intervention while simultaneously and rigorously evaluating the impact on salient outcomes. We used our experiences across 2 pilot trials in which the family check-up (Smith, Montaño, Mauricio, Berkel, & Dishion, 2016), an evidence-based family intervention, was integrated into primary care. In these pilot trials, the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation outcomes were used to guide the implementation and evaluate its success. Grounding our presentation in our pilot work offers an illustration of applying the EPIS framework and outcomes measurement to real-world problems and contexts. When embarking on new efforts to integrate behavioral interventions into health-care settings, the application of IS frameworks and measurement strategies can create generalizable knowledge that substantively contributes to a sparse literature. Today, those "in the trenches" who are translating evidence-based interventions to their setting can contribute to the corpus of research in integrated care by using IS methods to plan a new program and evaluate its feasibility, adoption, and reach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalFamilies, Systems and Health
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Family check-up
  • Implementation science
  • Integrated care
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{976c325d537d43b0b4b887f37d29d814,
title = "Using implementation science to guide the integration of evidence-based family interventions into primary care",
abstract = "This article is a demonstration of how an implementation-science (IS) framework can be coupled with the measurement of implementation outcomes to effectively integrate evidence-based family interventions in primary care. The primary care environment presents a number of challenges for successfully integrating such interventions. How-ever, IS methods can improve the prospect of successfully implementing a new intervention while simultaneously and rigorously evaluating the impact on salient outcomes. We used our experiences across 2 pilot trials in which the family check-up (Smith, Monta{\~n}o, Mauricio, Berkel, & Dishion, 2016), an evidence-based family intervention, was integrated into primary care. In these pilot trials, the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation outcomes were used to guide the implementation and evaluate its success. Grounding our presentation in our pilot work offers an illustration of applying the EPIS framework and outcomes measurement to real-world problems and contexts. When embarking on new efforts to integrate behavioral interventions into health-care settings, the application of IS frameworks and measurement strategies can create generalizable knowledge that substantively contributes to a sparse literature. Today, those {"}in the trenches{"} who are translating evidence-based interventions to their setting can contribute to the corpus of research in integrated care by using IS methods to plan a new program and evaluate its feasibility, adoption, and reach.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Family check-up, Implementation science, Integrated care, Primary care",
author = "Smith, {Justin D.} and Jodi Polaha",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/fsh0000252",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "125--135",
journal = "Families, Systems and Health",
issn = "1091-7527",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Using implementation science to guide the integration of evidence-based family interventions into primary care. / Smith, Justin D.; Polaha, Jodi.

In: Families, Systems and Health, Vol. 35, No. 2, 06.2017, p. 125-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using implementation science to guide the integration of evidence-based family interventions into primary care

AU - Smith, Justin D.

AU - Polaha, Jodi

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This article is a demonstration of how an implementation-science (IS) framework can be coupled with the measurement of implementation outcomes to effectively integrate evidence-based family interventions in primary care. The primary care environment presents a number of challenges for successfully integrating such interventions. How-ever, IS methods can improve the prospect of successfully implementing a new intervention while simultaneously and rigorously evaluating the impact on salient outcomes. We used our experiences across 2 pilot trials in which the family check-up (Smith, Montaño, Mauricio, Berkel, & Dishion, 2016), an evidence-based family intervention, was integrated into primary care. In these pilot trials, the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation outcomes were used to guide the implementation and evaluate its success. Grounding our presentation in our pilot work offers an illustration of applying the EPIS framework and outcomes measurement to real-world problems and contexts. When embarking on new efforts to integrate behavioral interventions into health-care settings, the application of IS frameworks and measurement strategies can create generalizable knowledge that substantively contributes to a sparse literature. Today, those "in the trenches" who are translating evidence-based interventions to their setting can contribute to the corpus of research in integrated care by using IS methods to plan a new program and evaluate its feasibility, adoption, and reach.

AB - This article is a demonstration of how an implementation-science (IS) framework can be coupled with the measurement of implementation outcomes to effectively integrate evidence-based family interventions in primary care. The primary care environment presents a number of challenges for successfully integrating such interventions. How-ever, IS methods can improve the prospect of successfully implementing a new intervention while simultaneously and rigorously evaluating the impact on salient outcomes. We used our experiences across 2 pilot trials in which the family check-up (Smith, Montaño, Mauricio, Berkel, & Dishion, 2016), an evidence-based family intervention, was integrated into primary care. In these pilot trials, the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation outcomes were used to guide the implementation and evaluate its success. Grounding our presentation in our pilot work offers an illustration of applying the EPIS framework and outcomes measurement to real-world problems and contexts. When embarking on new efforts to integrate behavioral interventions into health-care settings, the application of IS frameworks and measurement strategies can create generalizable knowledge that substantively contributes to a sparse literature. Today, those "in the trenches" who are translating evidence-based interventions to their setting can contribute to the corpus of research in integrated care by using IS methods to plan a new program and evaluate its feasibility, adoption, and reach.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Family check-up

KW - Implementation science

KW - Integrated care

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020536125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020536125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/fsh0000252

DO - 10.1037/fsh0000252

M3 - Article

C2 - 28617015

AN - SCOPUS:85020536125

VL - 35

SP - 125

EP - 135

JO - Families, Systems and Health

JF - Families, Systems and Health

SN - 1091-7527

IS - 2

ER -