TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of 18F-DCFPyL PET for local staging for high or very high risk prostate cancer for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy
AU - Li, Eric V.
AU - Schaeffer, Edward Matthew
AU - Ramesh Kumar, Sai Kaushik Shankar
AU - Zhou, Ruoji
AU - Yang, Ximing J
AU - Mana-Ay, Margarita
AU - Vescovo, Mariavittoria
AU - Ho, Austin
AU - Keeter, Mary Kate
AU - Carr, James
AU - Casalino, David
AU - Kocherginsky, Masha
AU - Patel, Hiten Dilip
AU - Ross, Ashley Evan
AU - Savas, Hatice
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: PSMA PET offers the potential for improved local staging prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated PSMA PET versus mpMRI for local and nodal staging for patients with localized NCCN high or very high risk prostate cancer undergoing RP. Methods: A prospective single center pilot study was conducted from 9/2018 to 6/2022. Patients underwent both mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with limited MRI sequences, followed by RP with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patient and side-specific performance of mpMRI and PSMA PET were compared to RP histopathological standard of truth for extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node involvement (LNI). Results: At RP, 79% (38/48) had EPE, 31% had SVI, and 31% had LNI. At the patient level for EPE, PSMA PET had similar sensitivity (65.8% vs. 84.2%, respectively, P = 0.07) but higher specificity (80% vs. 40%, P = 0.045) compared to mpMRI, respectively. For SVI, PSMA PET had lower sensitivity (62.5% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.046) and similar specificity (87.5% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.56). For side-specific LNI, PSMA PET had higher sensitivity (50% vs. 25%, P = 0.03) and similar specificity (96.1% vs. 94.7%, P = 0.71) compared to mpMRI. Conclusion: PSMA PET offers higher specificity for EPE and higher sensitivity for LNI compared to mpMRI. PSMA PET may improve overall surgical planning, and may be combined with diagnostic mpMRI and clinicopathological variables through nomograms to further predict EPE, SVI, or LNI. Clinical trial registration: NCT03392181 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03392181.
AB - Purpose: PSMA PET offers the potential for improved local staging prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated PSMA PET versus mpMRI for local and nodal staging for patients with localized NCCN high or very high risk prostate cancer undergoing RP. Methods: A prospective single center pilot study was conducted from 9/2018 to 6/2022. Patients underwent both mpMRI and 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with limited MRI sequences, followed by RP with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patient and side-specific performance of mpMRI and PSMA PET were compared to RP histopathological standard of truth for extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node involvement (LNI). Results: At RP, 79% (38/48) had EPE, 31% had SVI, and 31% had LNI. At the patient level for EPE, PSMA PET had similar sensitivity (65.8% vs. 84.2%, respectively, P = 0.07) but higher specificity (80% vs. 40%, P = 0.045) compared to mpMRI, respectively. For SVI, PSMA PET had lower sensitivity (62.5% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.046) and similar specificity (87.5% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.56). For side-specific LNI, PSMA PET had higher sensitivity (50% vs. 25%, P = 0.03) and similar specificity (96.1% vs. 94.7%, P = 0.71) compared to mpMRI. Conclusion: PSMA PET offers higher specificity for EPE and higher sensitivity for LNI compared to mpMRI. PSMA PET may improve overall surgical planning, and may be combined with diagnostic mpMRI and clinicopathological variables through nomograms to further predict EPE, SVI, or LNI. Clinical trial registration: NCT03392181 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03392181.
KW - Cancer
KW - Position-emission tomography
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - PSMA
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000211066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=86000211066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-025-07133-1
DO - 10.1007/s00259-025-07133-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 39928105
AN - SCOPUS:86000211066
SN - 1619-7070
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
ER -