Utilization of genetic testing in men with advanced prostate cancer

Jonathan A. Aguiar*, Eric V. Li, Mohammad R. Siddiqui, Moataz A. Soliman, Sai K.S.R. Kumar, Edward M. Schaeffer, Mary Kate Keeter, C. Hendricks Brown, Brittany M. Szymaniak, Ashley E. Ross

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Genetic evaluation of men with advanced prostate cancer is recognized as imperative both to guide treatment decisions and to trigger cascade genetic testing of family members. Here we investigate utilization patterns of genetic testing among a contemporary cohort of men with advanced prostate cancer at our institution. Methods: We queried the Northwestern Electronic Data Warehouse from January 2021 to present for all men diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk/very high-risk, regional, or metastatic prostate cancer. Patients were excluded from analyses if treated at an outside institution and/or presented for a second opinion evaluation. Statistics were performed using t-test, Chi-squared test, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: Atotal of 320 men (52.5%) had local/regional disease and 290 (47.5%) had metastatic disease, 53 (18.3%) of whom had castrate resistant prostate cancer. Rates of germline genetic testing rate were low in patients with localized disease (9.4%) and metastatic disease (34.1%). Only 19 (35.8%) men diagnosed with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer underwent germline genetic evaluation. Germline testing was most frequently discussed or ordered by medical oncologists (52%) followed by urologists (20%). Men who underwent germline testing were younger (p < 0.001), more likely to have Medicaid or private insurance (p = 0.002), and more likely to have metastatic disease (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline PSA, ethnicity, race, or castration sensitivity status. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91–0.97, p < 0.001) and metastatic disease (OR: 5.71, 95% CI: 3.63–9.22, p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of genetic testing on multivariable logistic regression. Conclusions: Here we report that utilization of genetic testing is associated with metastatic disease and inversely associated with age. Overall, utilization rates of genetic testing remain low in all patient groups, including in the metastatic castrate resistant setting, where genetic testing can identify patients with homologous recombination repair deficiency who may benefit from use of targeted therapeutics such as PARP inhibitors. Genetic testing in men with aggressive prostate cancer is critical and barriers to routine implementation of testing require further study to develop strategies to improve utilization rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)516-523
Number of pages8
JournalProstate
Volume83
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2023

Keywords

  • germline genetic testing
  • prostate cancer
  • targeted therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utilization of genetic testing in men with advanced prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this