TY - GEN
T1 - Validation of methods for determining ankle stiffness during walking using the Perturberator robot
AU - Rouse, Elliott J.
AU - Hargrove, Levi J.
AU - Akhtar, Aadeel
AU - Kuiken, Todd A.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Recently developed powered ankle prostheses are capable of providing users with biologically inspired control during walking. However, currently, the appropriate dynamic mechanical properties, or impedance, of the human ankle during walking is unknown. Before trustworthy estimates of the ankle's impedance can be obtained using the Perturberator robot, it must be thoroughly validated. In this study, the sensitivity of standing ankle impedance estimates to foot placement was investigated. Additionally, linear filters that mapped acceleration of the Perturberator motor angle to the forces caused by the robot's intrinsic impedance were determined. Lastly, impedance estimates of a prosthetic foot were obtained at four perturbation timing points during the stance phase of walking and compared to values obtained from an independent measure of prosthetic ankle stiffness. During standing, foot placement had a significant effect on ankle impedance measurements (p 0.001). The linear filters accounted for, on average, 98% of the variance in the forces caused by a perturbation. Lastly, when the impedance of the prosthetic foot was determined during walking, there was 3% error when compared to the stiffness measured by the independent measure at the appropriate timing in stance phase. This work was a preliminary, but important step toward our goal of determining the impedance of the human ankle during walking.
AB - Recently developed powered ankle prostheses are capable of providing users with biologically inspired control during walking. However, currently, the appropriate dynamic mechanical properties, or impedance, of the human ankle during walking is unknown. Before trustworthy estimates of the ankle's impedance can be obtained using the Perturberator robot, it must be thoroughly validated. In this study, the sensitivity of standing ankle impedance estimates to foot placement was investigated. Additionally, linear filters that mapped acceleration of the Perturberator motor angle to the forces caused by the robot's intrinsic impedance were determined. Lastly, impedance estimates of a prosthetic foot were obtained at four perturbation timing points during the stance phase of walking and compared to values obtained from an independent measure of prosthetic ankle stiffness. During standing, foot placement had a significant effect on ankle impedance measurements (p 0.001). The linear filters accounted for, on average, 98% of the variance in the forces caused by a perturbation. Lastly, when the impedance of the prosthetic foot was determined during walking, there was 3% error when compared to the stiffness measured by the independent measure at the appropriate timing in stance phase. This work was a preliminary, but important step toward our goal of determining the impedance of the human ankle during walking.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867423718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867423718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290840
DO - 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290840
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84867423718
SN - 9781457711992
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
SP - 1650
EP - 1655
BT - 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2012
T2 - 2012 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2012
Y2 - 24 June 2012 through 27 June 2012
ER -