Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Social Health Measures after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Implications for Patient Care

Elizabeth A Hahn*, Mary N. Walsh, Larry A. Allen, Christopher S. Lee, Quin E. Denfeld, Jeffrey J. Teuteberg, David G. Beiser, Colleen K. McIlvennan, Joann Lindenfeld, Liviu Klein, Eric D. Adler, Josef Stehlik, Bernice Ruo, Katy Bedjeti, Peter D. Cummings, Alyssa M. Vela, Kathleen L. Grady

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: A better understanding is needed of the burdens and benefits of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on patients' physical, mental, and social well-being. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for LVAD patients and to estimate clinically important score differences likely to have implications for patient treatment or care. Methods: Adults from 12 sites across all US geographic regions completed PROMIS measures ≥3 months post-LVAD implantation. Other patient-reported outcomes (eg, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 item), clinician ratings, performance tests, and clinical adverse events were used as validity indicators. Criterion and construct validity and clinically important differences were estimated with Pearson correlations, ANOVA methods, and Cohen d effect sizes. Results: Participants' (n=648) mean age was 58 years, and the majority were men (78%), non-Hispanic White people (68%), with dilated cardiomyopathy (55%), long-term implantation strategy (57%), and New York Heart Association classes I and II (54%). Most correlations between validity indicators and PROMIS measures were medium to large (≥0.3; p<0.01). Most validity analyses demonstrated medium-to-large effect sizes (≥0.5) and clinically important differences in mean PROMIS scores (up to 14.8 points). Ranges of minimally important differences for 4 PROMIS measures were as follows: fatigue (3-5 points), physical function (2-3), ability to participate in social roles and activities (3), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (3-5). Conclusions: The findings provide convincing evidence for the relevance and validity of PROMIS physical, mental, and social health measures in patients from early-to-late post-LVAD implantation. Findings may inform shared decision-making when patients consider treatment options. Patients with an LVAD, their caregivers, and their clinicians should find it useful to interpret the meaning of their PROMIS scores in relation to the general population, that is, PROMIS may help to monitor a return to normalcy in everyday life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E008690
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2023

Keywords

  • adult
  • fatigue
  • female
  • heart failure
  • humans
  • patient reported outcome measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Social Health Measures after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Implications for Patient Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this