Validity of Social Support Scales Utilized Among HIV-Infected and HIV-Affected Populations: A Systematic Review

Deshira D. Wallace*, Allison Pack, Breana Uhrig Castonguay, J. L. Stewart, Christine Schalkoff, Sruthi Cherkur, Margot Schein, Matthew Go, Jackson Devadas, Edwin B. Fisher, Carol E. Golin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social support enhances self-management and prevention of behaviors and is typically assessed using self-report scales; however, little is known about the validity of these scales in HIV-infected or affected populations. This systematic review aims to identify available validated social support scales used in HIV-infected and HIV-affected populations. A systematic literature search using key search terms was conducted in electronic databases. After rounds abstract screenings, full-text reviews, and data abstraction 17 studies remained, two of which assessed multiple social support scales, which increased number of scales to 19. Most scales assessed positive social support behaviors (n = 18). Most scales assessed perceived social support (n = 14) compared to received social support. Reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.97. The most common forms of validation reported were content validity and construct validity and the least was criterion-related validity. Future research should seek to build evidence for validation for existing scales used in HIV-infected or HIV-affected populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2155-2175
Number of pages21
JournalAIDS and behavior
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Measurement
  • Reliability
  • Social support
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of Social Support Scales Utilized Among HIV-Infected and HIV-Affected Populations: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this