Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot

Emily Pronin, Matthew B. Kugler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    147 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    People see themselves as less susceptible to bias than others. We show that a source of this bias blind spot involves the value that people place, and believe they should place, on introspective information (relative to behavioral information) when assessing bias in themselves versus others. Participants considered introspective information more than behavioral information for assessing bias in themselves, but not others. This divergence did not arise simply from differences in introspective access. The blind spot persisted when observers had access to the introspections of the actor whose bias they judged. And, participants claimed that they, but not their peers, should rely on introspections when making self-assessments of bias. Only after being educated about the importance of nonconscious processes in guiding judgment and action-and thereby about the fallibility of introspection-did participants cease denying their relative susceptibility to bias.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)565-578
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

    Fingerprint

    introspection
    Optic Disk
    trend
    self-assessment
    divergence
    Self-Assessment

    Keywords

    • Bias blind spot
    • Introspection illusion
    • Nonconscious influences
    • Self-other
    • Self-perception

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    @article{8b9775679c7e42c6bb2173b796a26bd0,
    title = "Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot",
    abstract = "People see themselves as less susceptible to bias than others. We show that a source of this bias blind spot involves the value that people place, and believe they should place, on introspective information (relative to behavioral information) when assessing bias in themselves versus others. Participants considered introspective information more than behavioral information for assessing bias in themselves, but not others. This divergence did not arise simply from differences in introspective access. The blind spot persisted when observers had access to the introspections of the actor whose bias they judged. And, participants claimed that they, but not their peers, should rely on introspections when making self-assessments of bias. Only after being educated about the importance of nonconscious processes in guiding judgment and action-and thereby about the fallibility of introspection-did participants cease denying their relative susceptibility to bias.",
    keywords = "Bias blind spot, Introspection illusion, Nonconscious influences, Self-other, Self-perception",
    author = "Emily Pronin and Kugler, {Matthew B.}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "565--578",
    journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
    issn = "0022-1031",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior : The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. / Pronin, Emily; Kugler, Matthew B.

    In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.07.2007, p. 565-578.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior

    T2 - The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot

    AU - Pronin, Emily

    AU - Kugler, Matthew B.

    PY - 2007/7/1

    Y1 - 2007/7/1

    N2 - People see themselves as less susceptible to bias than others. We show that a source of this bias blind spot involves the value that people place, and believe they should place, on introspective information (relative to behavioral information) when assessing bias in themselves versus others. Participants considered introspective information more than behavioral information for assessing bias in themselves, but not others. This divergence did not arise simply from differences in introspective access. The blind spot persisted when observers had access to the introspections of the actor whose bias they judged. And, participants claimed that they, but not their peers, should rely on introspections when making self-assessments of bias. Only after being educated about the importance of nonconscious processes in guiding judgment and action-and thereby about the fallibility of introspection-did participants cease denying their relative susceptibility to bias.

    AB - People see themselves as less susceptible to bias than others. We show that a source of this bias blind spot involves the value that people place, and believe they should place, on introspective information (relative to behavioral information) when assessing bias in themselves versus others. Participants considered introspective information more than behavioral information for assessing bias in themselves, but not others. This divergence did not arise simply from differences in introspective access. The blind spot persisted when observers had access to the introspections of the actor whose bias they judged. And, participants claimed that they, but not their peers, should rely on introspections when making self-assessments of bias. Only after being educated about the importance of nonconscious processes in guiding judgment and action-and thereby about the fallibility of introspection-did participants cease denying their relative susceptibility to bias.

    KW - Bias blind spot

    KW - Introspection illusion

    KW - Nonconscious influences

    KW - Self-other

    KW - Self-perception

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249788997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249788997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011

    DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 565

    EP - 578

    JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    SN - 0022-1031

    IS - 4

    ER -