TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for epithelial ovarian cancer at high volume hospitals in the United States and associated survival
AU - Barber, Emma L.
AU - Dusetzina, Stacie B.
AU - Stitzenberg, Karyn B.
AU - Rossi, Emma C.
AU - Gehrig, Paola A.
AU - Boggess, John F.
AU - Garrett, Joanne M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Objective To estimate variation in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by high volume hospitals and to determine the association between hospital utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival. Methods We identified incident cases of stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2012. Inclusion criteria were treatment at a high volume hospital (> 20 cases/year) and treatment with both chemotherapy and surgery. A logistic regression model was used to predict receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on case-mix predictors (age, comorbidities, stage etc). Hospitals were categorized by the observed-to-expected ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy use as low, average, or high utilization hospitals. Survival analysis was performed. Results We identified 11,574 patients treated at 55 high volume hospitals. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used for 21.6% (n = 2494) of patients and use varied widely by hospital, from 5%–55%. High utilization hospitals (n = 1910, 10 hospitals) had a median neoadjuvant chemotherapy rate of 39% (range 23–55%), while low utilization hospitals (n = 2671, 14 hospitals) had a median rate of 10% (range 5–17%). For all ovarian cancer patients adjusting for clinical and socio-demographic factors, treatment at a hospital with average or high neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization was associated with a decreased rate of death compared to treatment at a low utilization hospital (HR 0.90 95% CI 0.83–0.97 and HR 0.85 95% CI 0.75–0.95). Conclusions Wide variation exists in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer even among high volume hospitals. Patients treated at hospitals with low rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization experience decreased survival.
AB - Objective To estimate variation in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by high volume hospitals and to determine the association between hospital utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival. Methods We identified incident cases of stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2012. Inclusion criteria were treatment at a high volume hospital (> 20 cases/year) and treatment with both chemotherapy and surgery. A logistic regression model was used to predict receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on case-mix predictors (age, comorbidities, stage etc). Hospitals were categorized by the observed-to-expected ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy use as low, average, or high utilization hospitals. Survival analysis was performed. Results We identified 11,574 patients treated at 55 high volume hospitals. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used for 21.6% (n = 2494) of patients and use varied widely by hospital, from 5%–55%. High utilization hospitals (n = 1910, 10 hospitals) had a median neoadjuvant chemotherapy rate of 39% (range 23–55%), while low utilization hospitals (n = 2671, 14 hospitals) had a median rate of 10% (range 5–17%). For all ovarian cancer patients adjusting for clinical and socio-demographic factors, treatment at a hospital with average or high neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization was associated with a decreased rate of death compared to treatment at a low utilization hospital (HR 0.90 95% CI 0.83–0.97 and HR 0.85 95% CI 0.75–0.95). Conclusions Wide variation exists in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer even among high volume hospitals. Patients treated at hospitals with low rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization experience decreased survival.
KW - Hospital utilization
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Patterns of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016500887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016500887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 28366545
AN - SCOPUS:85016500887
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 145
SP - 500
EP - 507
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -