TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation in the care of septic shock
T2 - The impact of patient and hospital characteristics
AU - Lagu, Tara
AU - Rothberg, Michael B.
AU - Nathanson, Brian H.
AU - Pekow, Penelope S.
AU - Steingrub, Jay S.
AU - Lindenauer, Peter K.
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures: Drs Lagu, Lindenauer, Rothberg, Nathanson, and Pekow have no potential conflicts of interest. Dr Steingrub has received research grant support and participates in the lecture bureau of Eli Lilly & Company. Dr Nathanson, through his company OptiStatim LLC, was paid by the investigators with funding from the Department of Medicine at Baystate Medical Center to assist in conducting the statistical analyses in this study. Drs Lagu and Lindenauer had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Lagu, Lindenauer, Steingrub, and Rothberg conceived the study. Dr Lindenauer acquired the data. Drs Lagu, Lindenauer, Rothberg, Steingrub, Nathanson, and Pekow analyzed and interpreted the data. Dr Lagu drafted the manuscript. Drs Lindenauer, Rothberg, Nathanson, Pekow, and Steingrub critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. Drs Nathanson and Pekow carried out the statistical analyses.
Funding Information:
The study was conducted with funding from the Division of Critical Care and the Center for Quality of Care Research at Baystate Medical Center. Premier Healthcare Informatics, Charlotte NC, provided the data used to conduct this study but had no role in its design, conduct, analysis, interpretation of data, or the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. The authors also thank Nicholas Hannon for his help in formatting the tables and reference sections. An abstract of this work was recently published as part of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Congress Abstract Supplement.
Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine treatments of septic shock in a sample of US hospitals and to assess whether patient and hospital characteristics are associated with use of sepsis therapies. Materials and Methods: We studied 192 hospitals that treated 50 or more adults with septic shock between 2004 and 2006. We examined hospital-level variation in commonly used therapies including mechanical ventilation, activated protein C (APC), hydrocortisone, central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring, albumin/colloid, and pulmonary artery catheters. We calculated interquartile range to assess the hospital-level variation in treatment. We developed hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and selected treatments. Results: A total of 22 702 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared with patients younger than 45 years, patients 75 years or older were as likely to receive mechanical ventilation but less likely to receive APC (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45]), hydrocortisone (OR, 0.65 [0.56-0.75]), or CVP monitoring (OR, 0.73 [0.63-0.84]). Compared with whites, black patients were more likely to be mechanically ventilated (OR, 1.15 [1.05-1.25]) but less likely to receive hydrocortisone (OR, 0.86 [0.78-0.95]) or APC (0.70 [0.58-0.86]). Conclusion: Treatment of septic shock varies across hospitals. In contrast to mechanical ventilation, treatments with weaker supporting evidence showed greater variation, especially among black and older patients.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine treatments of septic shock in a sample of US hospitals and to assess whether patient and hospital characteristics are associated with use of sepsis therapies. Materials and Methods: We studied 192 hospitals that treated 50 or more adults with septic shock between 2004 and 2006. We examined hospital-level variation in commonly used therapies including mechanical ventilation, activated protein C (APC), hydrocortisone, central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring, albumin/colloid, and pulmonary artery catheters. We calculated interquartile range to assess the hospital-level variation in treatment. We developed hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and selected treatments. Results: A total of 22 702 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared with patients younger than 45 years, patients 75 years or older were as likely to receive mechanical ventilation but less likely to receive APC (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45]), hydrocortisone (OR, 0.65 [0.56-0.75]), or CVP monitoring (OR, 0.73 [0.63-0.84]). Compared with whites, black patients were more likely to be mechanically ventilated (OR, 1.15 [1.05-1.25]) but less likely to receive hydrocortisone (OR, 0.86 [0.78-0.95]) or APC (0.70 [0.58-0.86]). Conclusion: Treatment of septic shock varies across hospitals. In contrast to mechanical ventilation, treatments with weaker supporting evidence showed greater variation, especially among black and older patients.
KW - Racial disparities
KW - Sepsis
KW - Septic shock
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864133209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864133209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 22300489
AN - SCOPUS:84864133209
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 27
SP - 329
EP - 336
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
IS - 4
ER -