Variation of Quality of Life Data Collection Across INTERMACS Sites

Bhanu P. Gupta*, Kathleen L Grady, Tim Fendler, Philip G. Jones, John A. Spertus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Given the importance of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) after mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device implantation, the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) collects the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) before and after MCS. The success of data collection and potential implications of missing data on HRQL analyses are unknown. Methods We examined the frequency and reasons for not collecting baseline and 3-month KCCQ data across INTERMACS sites from May 2012 to December 2013. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine site variability (median odds ratios [MOR]) for not collecting KCCQ data to demonstrate the degree to which some sites can collect more complete data than others. Results Among 3960 and 3523 patients participating in INTERMACS before and 3 months after left ventricular assist device implantation, the KCCQ was not collected in 43.1% at baseline (range across sites, 0-100%) and 40.9% (range, 0-100%) at follow-up. The most common reasons for incomplete KCCQ data at baseline were that the patient was too sick (13.9%) and consent to participate in research was not obtained (12.4%). Significant variation across sites was observed for missingness because of patient (MOR, 2.8; P <.001) and administrative (MOR, 4.8; P <.001) reasons. The most variable patient reasons were that the patients were too stressed (MOR, 7.2; P <.001) and too busy (MOR, 10.6; P <.001). The most variable administrative reasons were that the coordinator was too busy/forgot (MOR, 7.1; P <.001) and miscellaneous reasons (MOR, 8.7; P <.001). At 3 months, significant variation persisted for both patient (MOR, 2.7; P <.001) and administrative (MOR, 3.5; P <.001) reasons. The most variability across sites was that the patient was too busy (MOR, 6.0, P <.001) and that the coordinator was too busy/forgot (MOR, 5.8; P <.001). Conclusions Sites vary substantially in collecting KCCQ data, and many of these variations seem addressable. Improving the consistency of HRQL data collection can improve the value of INTERMACS in defining the patient-centered benefits of MCS treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-337
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Keywords

  • Health-related quality of life (HRQL)
  • INTERMACS
  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Variation of Quality of Life Data Collection Across INTERMACS Sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this